(Shortened my original post because I realized maybe writing a dissertation on this was counterproductive to engaging a dialogue)
I'm getting tired of the reactionary criticism of EDC every time the Ravens lose. Apparently he can't draft, can't manage the cap, and is responsible for everything wrong with this team. I understand the frustration, but what I rarely see is anyone explaining what he realistically should've done differently.
I'm not saying EDC is perfect. I think relying on Faalele and Vorhees to develop was a mistake, I would've liked more veteran competition at guard, and Baltimore has struggled to develop a consistent homegrown pass rusher. But there's a difference between criticizing a decision and pretending the alternative was obvious.
Take the offensive line. Baltimore's 2024 line helped Henry rush for 1,921 yards, and Faalele improved as the season progressed. Expecting some continuity and development wasn't unreasonable, even if it ultimately didn't work.
Could EDC have signed Kevin Zeitler for $9 million? Absolutely, and I would've liked that. But Mekhi Becton got $20 million, Patrick Mekari $37.5 million, Will Fries $88 million, and Aaron Banks $77 million. Which of those contracts were people comfortable handing out, and what were we sacrificing elsewhere to afford them?
The Ravens also drafted Emery Jones in the third round, Carson Vinson in the fifth, and Garrett Dellinger in the seventh. That's three offensive linemen in one draft, so the idea that EDC ignored the position is nonsense.
And for everyone saying we should've drafted a guard higher, one of the best options near our second-round pick was Tate Ratledge, whom Detroit selected two picks before Baltimore took Mike Green. Getting Ratledge required trading up, which meant additional draft capital and potentially missing out on Green, a 17-sack college pass rusher at a position we also desperately needed to address. Wyatt Milum was similarly gone before our third-round selection. Marcus Mbow was available later, but selecting him would've meant passing on someone like Teddye Buchanan or Carson Vinson.
I'm happy to debate those alternatives, but you have to acknowledge the tradeoffs.
The Ronnie Stanley criticism makes even less sense to me. Baltimore retained a proven left tackle coming off a healthy season for $20 million annually. Dan Moore Jr. received $82 million over four years, Alaric Jackson got $57 million over three, and Jaylon Moore received $30 million over two despite limited starting experience.
Who was replacing Stanley? Moving Rosengarten to left tackle creates another hole at right tackle, and the premium tackles were already gone by pick 27. I don't understand complaining about the offensive line while simultaneously criticizing EDC for keeping its best lineman.
The salary cap matters, too. Without a Lamar extension, Baltimore has less flexibility to manage his future cap hits. Restructuring veterans creates room now but pushes obligations forward. People demanding we move on from Roquan or Marlon rarely acknowledge the dead money or the cost of replacing them.
And since people constantly bring up Isaiah Likely, what exactly was EDC supposed to do there? Likely wanted a bigger role and an opportunity to establish himself as a featured pass catcher, something that was always going to be difficult with Zay still on the roster. Baltimore wasn't going to force him to sign an extension, but offered him nearly the same deal the Giants did. He declined. HE declined, not the Ravens.
People also complain about extending Andrews, but consider the alternative. Likely and Kolar both left in free agency, so letting Andrews walk would've meant replacing practically the entire tight end room. In an offense that relies heavily on tight ends, that would've created another major need. I would've loved to keep Likely, but wanting a player to stay and having a realistic way to retain him are two very different things.
And people complain that EDC loves his own players too much, but maybe that's because they're actually good players. Linderbaum, Likely, Kolar, and Keaton Mitchell received more than $154 million in combined contract value from other teams this offseason. Add Patrick Queen, Ben Powers, Geno Stone, J.K. Dobbins, Odafe Oweh, Jordan Stout and others, and there's a pretty clear pattern of other organizations valuing players Baltimore developed.
Draft position is another enormous factor. Since 2019, EDC has had only two first-round selections inside the top 20, both at No. 14: Kyle Hamilton and Vega Ioane. Every other first-round pick has been 22nd or later.
Compare that to Cincinnati getting Burrow first overall and Chase fifth, or Philadelphia getting Jalen Carter ninth. Even Ozzie had Ogden at four, Boulware at four, Jamal Lewis at five, CMac at ten, Starks at ten, Suggs at ten, Ngata at twelve, and Stanley at six. Ozzie was an incredible GM, but he also had access to premium picks that EDC hasn't had.
Despite consistently drafting late, EDC has found Hamilton, Linderbaum, Zay Flowers, Travis Jones, and Nate Wiggins. Not every pick works, but that's true of every GM.
And who exactly is doing this so much better? Brett Veach drafted Clyde Edwards-Helaire over Jonathan Taylor, Skyy Moore over George Pickens, and Felix Anudike-Uzomah in the first round. Howie Roseman took Jalen Reagor over Justin Jefferson and pursued Russell Wilson before he rejected Philadelphia. Both are excellent GMs who've made significant mistakes.
And I'll offer one of my own draft criticisms: I wanted Nick Emmanwori over Malaki Starks. I thought he had more upside and versatility. That's a legitimate disagreement, but it doesn't automatically mean Starks was a bad selection.
Finally, at some point the coaches and players have to be accountable. EDC assembled the roster, but he isn't responsible for every missed tackle, blown assignment, or poor decision on the field. Minter has been adjusting, and I still believe this team has the talent to compete with anybody in the AFC if Lamar stays healthy and the execution improves.
I'm not pretending the Ravens have played well, and I'm certainly not guaranteeing a playoff run. But I don't think this roster is fundamentally broken, and I'm not writing off a team with this much talent in October.
So for everyone demanding EDC be fired, I'd genuinely like to know what you would've done differently. Who replaces Stanley? What are you giving up to draft Ratledge? How are you keeping Likely if he wants a bigger role elsewhere? Which guards are you signing, and where's the money coming from? What do you do if you're hamstrung by a contract with Lamar who's not renegotiating the way Mahomes, Allen, Burrow or Hurts are? Who replaces the veterans you want gone, and which GM has consistently drafted better from comparable positions?
I'm all for criticizing EDC when it's warranted, but I'm tired of people ignoring the actual alternatives and acting like every mistake was obvious in hindsight.
TL;DR: EDC has made mistakes, particularly along the offensive line, but roster construction involves tradeoffs. You can't sign every free agent, draft every breakout player, and retain every good veteran without sacrificing something. If you think he should be fired, explain what you would've done differently and what it would've cost.
And no, this isn't EDC's burner account. I just think we can criticize the guy without pretending he's a fucking idiot.