Owner of both the Core One and Core One L here. I love the workflow of these printers, which is ultimately what led me to sell my Bambu Lab H2D.
It's worth mentioning that during the entire time I owned the H2D, I HAD ZERO. NADA. NONE. Not a single issue with it.
I sold it primarily because of Bambu Lab's questionable business practices, cloud dependency, and the general lack of trust I had in the company's approach. I never felt entirely comfortable with the idea of having my designs sitting in an ecosystem I didn't fully trust. Do I have proof that Bambu would steal a profitable design? No, I don't. I'm not going to pretend otherwise. But concerns about intellectual property and the copying of products by companies operating in China are part of why I was uncomfortable. That's a concern and a perception, not evidence that Bambu itself has stolen my designs.
Now, looking at where things stand with Prusa, I'm starting to question whether I made the right decision.
Bambu has had automated Pressure Advance calibration for quite some time, while Prusa still doesn't offer an equivalent integrated workflow. We have only recently received wireless tag recognition for a single filament roll. Perhaps other improvements are coming, but some developments feel slow and out of sync with what's already available elsewhere.
Not long ago, CNC Kitchen demonstrated a tool he designed himself to automate Pressure Advance calibration using measurements from the printer's nozzle probe. I'm going by memory here, so forgive me if I'm getting some of the technical details wrong, but the result was essentially automated PA calibration.
This would save me HOURS of filament tuning. And because PrusaSlicer doesn't currently offer the workflow I want, I've had to resort to OrcaSlicer, which I simply don't enjoy using as much.
Josef Prusa himself jumped into the YouTube comments to say that this functionality was in the works. Great. But I'm increasingly skeptical of promises about upcoming features. I've seen enough examples of features being announced or discussed that take a very long time to materialize, if they ever do.
Then there's Wi-Fi.
Both my Core One and Core One L became unusable over Wi-Fi following the 6.8.1 firmware update. Both are now running firmware 8.0, and after countless hours with Prusa Support, I still don't have a solution.
We've replaced Buddy boards, replaced Wi-Fi boards, and reflashed earlier firmware versions. Nothing solved the problem.
Both machines worked for months on the same network, which hasn't changed. The problem appears to be that the printers lose their Wi-Fi functionality after losing connectivity to Prusa Connect. At that point, the Wi-Fi interface effectively disappears. Running the network wizard reports that no Wi-Fi hardware is connected.
I've submitted logs and other information through GitHub. Eventually, I gave up waiting for a fix and purchased an additional mesh access point so I could connect both printers through Ethernet.
Think about that for a moment. In 2026, I have two otherwise excellent printers that I cannot reliably use over Wi-Fi, despite extensive troubleshooting and hardware replacements.
PrusaSlicer is another area where I have mixed feelings.
I genuinely prefer it to the alternatives, and I'm glad to see development continuing. The new beta looks promising, and I appreciate the direction things are heading. But it still feels like it has a long way to go before it becomes a workflow I want to use every day. While testing the beta, I found myself wanting to close it and return to something else. I can appreciate the potential without pretending it's ready for my daily use.
And now we have the upcoming Bambu Lab H3C, while Prusa's INDX system is still being developed. Add the firmware issues, the slicer shortcomings, and the uncertainty around when promised features will arrive, and I'm genuinely on the fence about switching back.
The financial cost and the compromises associated with Bambu's cloud ecosystem might ultimately be worth it if I can spend more time printing and less time troubleshooting, waiting for updates, and working around missing features.
The irony is that I experienced none of these operational headaches with the H2D. I owned several Bambu products and generally sold them before their next flagship arrived. I switched because I wanted an ecosystem I felt more comfortable with, not because the machines weren't doing their jobs.
Prusa machines are excellent in many respects, and I still prefer aspects of their workflow. But I'm beginning to wonder whether owning them requires more patience than I'm willing to invest.
This is me thinking out loud, and I'd genuinely like to hear other people's opinions. It's perfectly fine to disagree with me.
For those who have owned both ecosystems, how do you feel about the trade-off between Prusa's approach to openness and ownership, and Bambu's more mature automation and overall workflow? At what point do you stop waiting for promised features and choose the product that works best for you today?