to also be fair i did read lapvona last year (not really read, got about halfway through before realising it took me 10 days to read that much), me and that person have different preferences but as i think about it i still kind of stand by what upset me. but what upset me might not be indicative of the rest of her stuff?
(next paragraph is a needless rant)
I did not like the omniscience* at all, i feel like it just ruined my flow so often and left me not curious about anything happening in the book, i also felt like the prose went against rhythm, but i can see that some of her other work is in first person and i feel like that would work better for what ive seen of her writing? I also just felt like it was boring when everyone was a horrible person, which is weird because i usually like that but they way she did it annoyed me, again i think it was about the omniscience*. And again with the prose i didnt really get to feel disgusted when everything was just told in such a matter of fact way with no further elaboration, people said this book would be smelly but i found myself not really giving into the scenery when everyone was beign too horrible in dull ways. for a quick bit of comparison, i really enjoyed perfume, which is sort of similar with these ridiculous awful characters and this stinky world and sort of aimless plot with a semi-omniscience* structure but i feel like the prose really enriched that world and brought it to life.
I feel like most of my gripes with Lapvona translate to me not thinking the prose fit the setting and disliking the way the omniscience* perspective was handled
but im kind of just sick of seething when i have to see her name, funnily enough i dont want to be a hater with an unpopular opinion, i want to at least see her name and go "oh well i didnt like lapvona but X was fun!". which of her books would you consider to be her strongest and the least like lapvona? or should i just choose peace, give up, and read one of the hundreds of other books im already interested in?