The Nike Mercurials from 2016/17 and Hypervenom Phantom 3 Elite from 2017/18 were the perfect boots for me. Everything clicked: the upper grip, comfort, traction, lockdown and, most importantly, the feeling when striking the ball.
From what I understand, Nike used Teijin-engineered uppers during that era. Since they went their separate ways, I’ve personally felt that Nike’s upper quality and feel have declined, particularly after 2021.
I’ve struggled to find that same feeling ever since.
Here’s what I’ve tried:
● Adidas X Crazyfast (triple white): The upper felt too plasticky and flimsy. It simply wasn’t for me.
● Nike Mercurials (2024/25): Far too grippy, especially on 4G pitches. When dribbling or pushing the ball forward, it would catch on the upper, and I’d repeatedly trip over it. I lasted around 3–5 games before switching and when I did switch, I never once tripped over the ball again (I knew I wasn’t bugging)
● Nike Phantom: A massive improvement. Lockdown was decent but toebox comfort weren’t ideal, but I made them work and finished the season with 24 goals and 8 assists across all competitions.
● Mizuno Morelia Neo IV Beta: Loved the kangaroo leather, comfort and touch. However, the softer feel seemed better suited to a midfielder. As a forward, I wanted a more immediate, responsive connection when striking the ball.
● Mizuno Alpha III: Excellent for striking and better suited to my game, but the toebox was uncomfortable and lockdown wasn’t convincing during lateral movements. I also found the studs quite aggressive on certain pitches, making me uncomfortable with the rotational traction, particularly given the risk of twisting an ankle.
So, F50 or Superfly?
The newer Nike Mercurial Superfly has caught my attention again because I hope it might recapture the magic of the 2016/17 generation.
However, the newer Adidas F50 also looks appealing, particularly with its seemingly softer, more accommodating upper compared with the Crazyfast I tried.
Has the F50 now overtaken the Superfly for upper feel, ball control and overall performance, or does Nike still have the edge? More importantly, which is closer to the older Mercurials and Hypervenom Phantom 3 Elite?
As a forward, I’m looking for:
● A direct, responsive and satisfying feel when striking the ball.
● An upper with enough grip for control, but not so much that the ball catches instead of gliding naturally.
● Good lockdown during acceleration and lateral movements.
● A comfortable toebox and reliable traction on 4G pitches.
I’m not necessarily chasing the lightest boot. I want that combination of comfort, touch, responsiveness and traction where everything just clicks.
What about professional players?
I’ve noticed Pedro Neto switching from Mercurial Vapors to Adidas F50s. João Pedro, one of my favourite strikers, wears F50s too, as does Ousmane Dembélé.
It makes me wonder what attracts these players to the F50. Is it personal preference, fit, performance or sponsorship arrangements? And for those who stick with Mercurials, what makes them prefer the Superfly over the F50?
I know professional players have different needs, and sponsorship can influence what we see, but I’m curious whether the F50 offers something the Mercurial doesn’t.
For anyone who’s tried both the current F50 and Superfly:
Which has the better upper feel, striking responsiveness and dribbling experience?
Which is closer to the 2016/17 Mercurials and 2017/18 Hypervenom Phantom 3 Elite?
Has the newer F50’s softer upper made a meaningful difference compared with the Crazyfast?
Have the newer Mercurials improved in terms of that overly grippy upper, particularly on 4G?
Which would you personally buy in my position, and why?
I’d especially appreciate opinions from people who’ve worn both the older and newer generations. Are the F50 or Superfly worth buying to recapture that old-school feeling, or should I look elsewhere with a different recommendation?