Hi! I'm working on Lilbimo, a free illustrated story website for parents and young children to explore together. I'm looking for feedback on the existing site, especially on phones and tablets.

The stories follow a child and their parent through familiar moments: splashing in the bath, a first haircut, or wanting to keep playing when it's time to leave the playground. You choose a story and a character, tell it in your own words, and use Next and Back at your own pace.

Try it here: https://lilbimo.com/en

No signup, payment, or download is needed. The site has no ads.

A short test would help: choose a story, start it, move forward a few scenes, then go back once. I'd love to know:

1. Was it obvious how to start and move through the story?

2. Did anything feel awkward, too small, or broken on your device?

3. Was it clear that this is something for an adult and child to use together?

Please share your browser/device if you spot a bug. Feedback from adults is welcome; there's no need to share a child's name, photos, or other personal details. Thanks for taking a look!

Hi everyone!

I've been building something called AI Opportunity World, and I'm looking for five people willing to test the first mission and give me honest feedback.

It's an interactive learning adventure designed to teach practical AI skills through real-world situations rather than traditional courses or quizzes.

In the first mission, you'll:

• Handle customer requests using AI
• Investigate a business problem
• Identify privacy risks
• Build an automation workflow
• Fact-check AI-generated information

Playtest details:

• Platform: Web browser
• Cost: Completely free
• Experience required: None
• Compensation: Unpaid
• Feedback: Short Google Form after playing

Play the game: https://ai-opportunity-world-advent-530.created.app/

Feedback form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe0LKqP6H_DV8AG9UjbpdTPYxgrr7YEnrazxLiHvFCb2Bz3zw/viewform

I'm especially interested in knowing whether the instructions are clear, whether the challenges are engaging, and whether anything breaks or becomes confusing.

This is an early version with one complete mission. Additional areas are still in development.

Constructive criticism is very welcome! Thanks to anyone willing to give it a try.

Hi, I'm Victor, one of three people working on Analyzera. We've worked on a portfolio analytics tool you use from ChatGPT or Claude through an MCP, and it's in open beta now.

What you can do with it:

• Import your holdings from a screenshot of your broker
• Look at risk and overlap
• Screen stocks
• Build a strategy and backtest it
• Or check what saving 500 a month gets you over 20 years.
  

Most of the time has gone into the data side, which is all Python. We get prices and company data from a market data provider and run a pipeline every night. The annoying part has been getting everything to line up. The same company is listed on several exchanges in different currencies, sometimes a stock shows up twice, funds don't always report what they hold. We ended up writing a lot of checks, and if a day looks wrong it just doesn't get used until one of us has looked at it.

The risk model was the most fun part to build. It's a factor model, so risk is calculated from what you hold right now and not from the history of your portfolio, since most people's portfolios don't have much history anyway. Funds are split into the stocks they hold, so you can see when two funds basically own the same things. One thing that took a while to get right was that markets close at different times. Stockholm closes before New York, so a move in the US shows up in Swedish prices the next day, and the returns have to be lined up for that or the correlations come out wrong.

Backtests only use data that was available on each date. Prices and fundamentals are fine, but ESG ratings and theme lists have only been stored since 2026, so backtests on those have some hindsight in them. Trading costs aren't deducted either. Both are on the list.

Just a note about data: we only get what the AI sends to us, not your chats. Saved data is stored in Stockholm and you can delete it. It can't trade and it's not financial advice.

Free during the beta, setup is on analyzera.com under MCP. If you know this stuff better than us and see something off, I'd honestly like to hear it :)

Echo is my iPhone app. Each morning it shows you one old photo from your own camera roll, and you keep it or swipe for another.

What I can't test myself is whether the picks feel right on someone else's library. On the first day it knows nothing about you and goes mostly on photo quality. After that it learns from what you keep and swipe.

If you can use it for 3 mornings, I'd like to know:

• was the first photo a good one or a miss?
• how did the picks feel over the 3 days?
• anything confusing or broken?

It's free, up to 4 memories a day, no account. Your photos are never uploaded to us. It does send crash reports and usage analytics.

https://apps.apple.com/app/id6775021634

Comments here are perfect.

Hi! I'm the founder of Agenlate (https://agenlate.com/), now in BETA after 8 weeks of building.

What it is: you describe AI agents in plain words, put them in a room, and a supervisor makes them work together on one goal. The video has a short example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQ5ml9vHcps

What you can test today:

- Connect your own OpenRouter API key (for now, in the beta, that's how you use any of the language models listed in the platform)

- Create 2 or 3 agents (for example, a researcher and a writer)

- Give the room a goal, like a short research brief with sources

- Run it and follow every step and its cost

- Use the result (it can be copied or downloaded)

What's not there yet: it focuses on research and writing today; I'd like to take these same teams to more complex tasks later.

What I need from you: try it on a task of your own, then tell me where you got stuck, what worked and what you'd want next. Honest criticism helps more than praise.

Comment or DM me for a beta code. Questions before you start or while you're using it? Ask me and I'll gladly guide you.

I run Mira, a small AI-assisted project, and I'm looking for up to five adults to try a free private beta in their browser.

Mira is a fictional AI character for light conversation: talking about your day, swapping book or music ideas, or finding the words to reconnect with someone. Friendship is the default; gentle nonsexual romance is optional. She's an AI, and this isn't therapy or emergency support.

The test: have one 5–10 minute chat in English, Portuguese or Spanish. If you're willing, tell me:

• Was it clear what Mira is and how your messages are handled?
• What felt natural, awkward or confusing?
• Would you choose to use it again? Why or why not?

Current limits: text only, no persistent conversation memory, voice or video. Up to 15 replies per person per day, subject to a shared monthly allowance. The pilot is free and unpaid, with no payment card or positive review required.

It's an invitation-only pilot, not an open demo. Mira's public introduction and contact profile shows the character. To request a place, DM MIRA there. The automated welcome explains the pilot before asking for adult confirmation, language and a private invitation email. Access is arranged at scheduled checks, not instantly.

In the app, messages and recent context go to Anthropic after consent. Mira doesn't save chat transcripts; Anthropic has its own retention policy. The operator can read invitation messages. Please keep emails and personal details out of public comments; fictional chat topics are fine for testing.

Happy to answer questions here. Honest criticism is useful, and you can stop whenever you want.

Building Charged, a check-in app for couples — instead of wondering how your partner's doing, you each keep a simple "battery" that reflects it honestly, updated through quick daily check-ins. There's also an AI companion (Ember) if you'd rather talk than tap through questions.

Looking for real Android testers — actually using it for a couple weeks, checking in when it prompts you, pairing up with a partner if you've got one.

Android — three quick steps, no sign-up needed:

Join group: https://groups.google.com/g/charged-testers

Opt in: https://play.google.com/apps/testing/love.charged.app

Install: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=love.charged.app

iPhone — no sign-up needed, just join directly:

TestFlight: https://testflight.apple.com/join/zt4mUVAP

Happy to answer anything here.