r/scotus • • Jan 30 '22

Things that will get you banned

347 Upvotes

Let's clear up some ambiguities about banning and this subreddit.

On Politics

Political discussion isn't prohibited here. In fact, a lot of the discussion about the composition of the Supreme Court is going to be about the political process of selecting a justice.

Your favorite flavor of politics won't get you banned here. Racism, bigotry, totally bad-faithed whataboutisms, being wildly off-topic, etc. will get you banned though. We have people from across the political spectrum writing screeds here and in modmail about how they're oppressed with some frequency. But for whatever reason, people with a conservative bend in particular, like to show up here from other parts of reddit, deliberately say horrendous shit to get banned, then go back to wherever they came from to tell their friends they're victims of the worst kinds of oppression. Y'all can build identities about being victims and the mods, at a very basic level, do not care—complaining in modmail isn't worth your time.

COVID-19

Coming in here from your favorite nonewnormal alternative sub or facebook group and shouting that vaccines are the work of bill gates and george soros to make you sterile will get you banned. Complaining or asking why you were banned in modmail won't help you get unbanned.

Racism

I kind of can't believe I have to write this, but racism isn't acceptable. Trying to dress it up in polite language doesn't make it "civil discussion" just because you didn't drop the N word explicitly in your comment.

This is not a space to be aggressively wrong on the Internet

We try and be pretty generous with this because a lot of people here are skimming and want to contribute and sometimes miss stuff. In fact, there are plenty of threads where someone gets called out for not knowing something and they go "oh, yeah, I guess that changes things." That kind of interaction is great because it demonstrates people are learning from each other.

There are users that get super entrenched though in an objectively wrong position. Or start talking about how they wish things operated as if that were actually how things operate currently. If you're not explaining yourself or you're not receptive to correction you're not the contributing content we want to propagate here and we'll just cut you loose.

  • BUT I'M A LAWYER!

Having a license to practice law is not a license to be a jackass. Other users look to the attorneys that post here with greater weight than the average user. Trying to confuse them about the state of play or telling outright falsehoods isn't acceptable.

Thankfully it's kind of rare to ban an attorney that's way out of bounds but it does happen. And the mods don't care about your license to practice. It's not a get out of jail free card in this sub.

Signal to Noise

Complaining about the sub is off topic. If you want the sub to look a certain way then start voting and start posting the kind of content you think should go here.

  • I liked it better before when the mods were different!

The current mod list has been here for years and have been the only active mods. We have become more hands on over the years as the users have grown and the sub has faced waves of problems like users straight up stalking a female journalist. The sub's history isn't some sort of Norman Rockwell painting.

Am I going to get banned? Who is this post even for, anyway?

Probably not. If you're here, reading about SCOTUS, reading opinions, reading the articles, and engaging in discussion with other users about what you're learning that's fantastic. This post isn't really for you.

This post is mostly so we can point to something in our modmail to the chucklefuck that asks "why am I banned?" and their comment is something inevitably insane like, "the holocaust didn't really kill that many people so mask wearing is about on par with what the jews experienced in nazi germany also covid isn't real. Justice Gorsuch is a real man because he no wears face diaper." And then we can send them on to the admins.


r/scotus • • Jan 09 '26

Order Bans are going to go out to top level comments that are emotional reactions or off topic. This is a heads up to anyone who wants to change how they’re posting.

44 Upvotes

This is SCOTUS. Talk about scotus. Talk about the opinions issued. If you want to criticize them that’s fine but have something to back it up.

Complaining about “tRump”, trump, motorhomes, “scrotus”, or any other number of things where you react to something instead of respond to something isn’t going to fly. The bar is very low. Almost all of you are tripping over it.


r/scotus • • 7h ago

news Neil Young sues Trump committee for $10M for playing 'Rockin' in the Free World' at rally

Thumbnail
cnbc.com
778 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 4h ago

news Judge throws out new charges against ex-FBI officials in Hunter Biden probe

Thumbnail
cbsnews.com
268 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 4h ago

news DOJ fails to get indictment against former Trump aide Cassidy Hutchinson

Thumbnail
abcnews.com
174 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 17h ago

news Supreme Court justice's rare public rebuke staggers court watchers

Thumbnail
rawstory.com
1.3k Upvotes

r/scotus • • 11h ago

news Trump says he will respect midterm results ‘if they’re honest elections’

Thumbnail
thehill.com
369 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 12h ago

news Trump Administration Accused of Concealing Secret Court Ruling on Warrantless Surveillance of Americans

Thumbnail
ibtimes.co.uk
371 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 14h ago

news The Supreme Court is poised to make taxpayers fund anti-LGBTQ discrimination

Thumbnail
vox.com
490 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 22h ago

news Former Miss Switzerland Alleges Trump Raped Her in 1993 After Being Introduced by Epstein

Thumbnail
people.com
560 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 1d ago

news James Comey charged for a third time by the Trump administration

Thumbnail
nbcnews.com
898 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 1d ago

news Appeals court rejects Trump DOJ demand to set aside 20,000 California mail ballots

Thumbnail
cnn.com
570 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 20h ago

news Judge appears skeptical of DOJ's legal maneuvering in Alaska lawsuit

Thumbnail
abcnews.com
69 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 1d ago

news Trump DOJ unlawfully fired Epstein prosecutor Maurene Comey, judge rules

Thumbnail
cnbc.com
1.2k Upvotes

r/scotus • • 1d ago

news Judge continues to block Trump admin. from cutting down trees at D.C. golf course

Thumbnail
cbsnews.com
129 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 1d ago

news Trump offers $1M reward for voter fraud tips that result in conviction

Thumbnail
abcnews.com
72 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 1d ago

news Alaska Senate: Peltola seeks quick dismissal of DOJ election lawsuit suit before midterm

Thumbnail
cnbc.com
296 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 2d ago

news The D.C. Bar Is Now Officially Deciding Whether to Investigate Chief Justice Roberts for Misconduct

Thumbnail
cmarmitage.substack.com
12.2k Upvotes

r/scotus • • 1d ago

news Bets on Alito Show Supreme Court Tangled in Prediction Markets

Thumbnail
news.bloomberglaw.com
84 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 1d ago

news The next wave of Trump cases headed toward the Supreme Court

Thumbnail
thehill.com
169 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 2d ago

news Supreme Court Justices Grouse About Job as Divisions Take Toll

Thumbnail
news.bloomberglaw.com
457 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 2d ago

news Federal appeals court to hear arguments in Trump administration's voting lawsuit against California

Thumbnail
abcnews.com
84 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 3d ago

news These Two Supreme Court Justices Will Do Anything for Trump—We Just Got the Proof

Thumbnail
slate.com
850 Upvotes

r/scotus • • 3d ago

Opinion Ketanji Brown Jackson issues public dissent in New Hampshire voting case

Thumbnail
thehill.com
1.5k Upvotes

r/scotus • • 3d ago

Opinion Where the Supreme Court favors Trump on the emergency docket – and where it doesn’t

Thumbnail
scotusblog.com
29 Upvotes