Hi Everyone,

I would like to reduce tech exposure, as my current two ETFs are quite tech heavy - SWDA and IWMO. IWMO even more than SWDA due to Momentum Factor that favours tech currently.

It's not that I need dividends (it will be set as reinvest or accumulating anyway), but when I was doing a research, I really struggled to find an ETF that isn't tech heavy. All Quality ETFs I saw were tech heavy, some popular Value ETFs had Micron occupying first spot. I don't really want Emerging Markets, I have got some small Small Cap Value exposure via AVWS ETF and don't want to increase it, so that leaves me with Dividend ETFs that haven't really got tech so they tick all the boxes I need.

https://www.justetf.com/uk/etf-profile.html?isin=NL0011683594

https://www.justetf.com/uk/etf-profile.html?isin=IE000MRIQ479

https://www.justetf.com/uk/etf-profile.html?isin=IE00BK5BR626

Is there any meaningful difference between them? VDIV had an excellent run over the last 5 years, LDGA is quite new, but doing ok so far and I like it's setup. VGWE is one of classics, not the best not the worst. I feel like there is no bad choice here really, but maybe I am missing something? Or maybe there is some other type of ETF I should consider?

Cheers

I think one of the easiest mistakes in ETF investing is constantly changing your portfolio because someone online found a fund that sounds better than what you're already holding.

One day it's a water ETF because water infrastructure could become more important. The next day it's international diversification, a different S&P 500 alternative, or some new sector that everyone suddenly thinks has enormous potential.

Researching those options is useful, but eventually you have to distinguish between a genuine reason to change your strategy and the feeling that you're missing out on something.

Personally, I'd rather have a portfolio built around my time horizon, risk tolerance, diversification needs, and fees than keep switching funds every time a new idea gets popular. The perfect ETF doesn't exist, and adding more funds doesn't automatically make a portfolio better.

Thematic ETFs can have a place, but I'd treat them as intentional investments rather than assuming an interesting industry will automatically produce better returns for shareholders.

A portfolio you understand and can stick with is more useful than one you constantly rebuild because of something you read online.

I'm not against reviewing investments when circumstances change. I just think every change should have a clear reason beyond wanting to optimize something that was already working.

The question is fairly straight forward, do you like factor or multi factor funds such as VFLO, GARP, etc. that self adjust for market conditions when buying ETFs in a regular brokerage account where you may be hit with capital gains if the market shifts and you need to rebalance your portfolio because you went all in on index or sector funds like AI ETFs or whatever?

What do yall like for a water ETF?

Curious if anyone knows how often E-Trade reviews the ETF options available for automatic investing. 4 of my 5 ETFs are available, with SPMD (mid-cap 400) being the sole holdout. I'd love nothing more than to turn on auto-invest for my portfolio and not login to E-Trade for the next 10 years.

I know IJH is an option, but I'm irrationally holding out hope that E-Trade eventually adds SPMD where I already have a meaningful position, especially considering SPSM (small cap 600) is an automatic invest choice.

Any comments?

I'll feel pretty good about my portfolio, then spend 20 minutes on Reddit and suddenly I'm questioning everything.

Someone recommends a different ETF, someone else explains why international stocks are a must, and then there's a whole debate about whether the S&P 500 is too concentrated. Somehow I end up with 10 new tabs open and no actual changes made.

I know constantly switching strategies probably isn't helping, but it's hard not to wonder if you're missing something obvious.

How do you guys decide when a portfolio actually needs changing versus when you've just been reading too much investing advice?

It seems like every ETF portfolio can be improved on paper. Add international exposure, adjust the factor tilts, lower the expense ratio, reduce overlap, or replace a fund that has underperformed recently.

The problem is that every improvement introduces another decision to second-guess later.

A portfolio with three funds that you understand and can hold through a bad decade might be more useful than a theoretically better portfolio that makes you constantly want to tinker.

I'm starting to think a good ETF strategy needs two parts:

• An investment plan: What you buy, why you own it, and how much you contribute.
• A rule for leaving it alone: What would genuinely justify changing the plan, rather than just making you uncomfortable?

For example, a fund underperforming for a year wouldn't necessarily be a reason to sell. A change in your goals, time horizon, or need for diversification might be.

The part I find most interesting is that a portfolio can be perfectly reasonable mathematically but still be a bad fit for the person holding it if it encourages constant second-guessing.

How do you decide that your ETF portfolio is good enough? Do you have specific rules for when you'll make changes, or do you mostly stick to your plan unless your circumstances change?

Has anyone else reallocated their VOOG to other ETFs recently due to AI bubble concerns?

I feel like I’m over indexed on tech and feel I should maybe put my money into VXUS, VTV or BND.

Thoughts? Thanks!

I’m 40, have a high risk tolerance, and want to pair IXN with an ETF for maximum long-term growth and broad global exposure. What would you recommend for a 5–10 year horizon, and why? Feel free to suggest any ETF or strategy.

Hello - I'm a 67 year old retiree and have enjoyed the performance of my portfolio with a breakdown of 72% equities and 28% in bonds. I'm feeling like I should peel off some of my highest return funds and drop the monies into BND. I have a good chunk in other bond funds including portions in the FBALX (mixed bag), PFIIX, VGSH and SCHO. I'd like to also shift away from PFIIX due to the higher fees. I'd love to hear where others my age or near, or older, are thinking about their own bond plays. Thank you all in advance.

New job has 401k. Not sure which to choose. I am completely unfamiliar with these. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

A little background: I'm 27M, and currently have around $174k invested. I started investing pretty heavily at the beginning of this year and can comfortably maintain the same pace for at least the next 3 years.

Here's my current monthly breakdown:

- $6k/month in VOO + VT (I know there's a lot of overlap)
- $600/month in SMH
- $200/month in Amazon

I've recently paused my Amazon and SMH investments, and now I'm wondering if I should pause VOO and VT as well, given the current market conditions.

I've been thinking about building up some cash and waiting for a market correction before investing more. My biggest concern is that even a 3% drop could wipe out most of my gains since I only started investing heavily this year.

Also, I'm not contributing to a Roth IRA since I'm an international and don't expect to benefit from the long-term tax advantages.

**Curious what others would do in my situation.** Would you keep investing consistently or build up cash and wait for a correction?

After observing the amount of "VOO vs SPYM?" posts in this sub, I am recognizing this is a community of analytical people who find comfort in doing diligence before making decisions. I am one of you. The trouble I faced was drawing a line in the sand and saying "ok I've done more than enough diligence for 10 lifetimes now it's time to act".

I am a recovering analysis paralysis addict and asked myself the above types of questions more times than I can count. I spent months in the "strategy phase" ideating, back-testing (this should be listed as a schedule 1 drug - HIGHLY ADDICTIVE), and worrying about what the market was going to do in the coming weeks so that I could somehow "game" the perfect entry point.

My solution to get over all that was to keep my focus on the accumulation of shares as opposed to what I thought was going to happen to the prices and market. **Getting lost down back-testing rabbit holes was all about prices. Focusing on the shares removed the timing anxiety.

I've been a long term passive investor for over 10 years and I prevented myself from continuing to move forward because I was convinced some big crash in the market was coming and I wanted to wait until after to keep buying more. DUMB. Bad move.

When the market crashes you're buying more shares on sale for 30% off.

VTI vs VOO really doesn't matter. VOO vs SPYM even more hilariously really doesn't matter.

If you've done enough work to question the difference between VOO and SPYM, give yourself a pat on the back for doing enough, and get started.

Looking to put 5-8k into a Roth I want to diversify between logistical companies ETFS and it probably be smart to diversify in Ai
Which companies do yall recommend? And how much would you diversify a 5-8k budget?

I’d also like stocks that offer dividends!

And should I wait until after the midterm elections?

I'm looking for something similar to QDVE, but globally diversified and including companies like Google, Amazon, and Meta, not just the traditional IT sector.

I like IWMO, but would prefer a global tech/growth ETF without momentum-based selection. Any suggestions?

I kept seeing portfolios here built on VOO + VTI + QQQ, so I ran the correlations on two years of daily returns.

For reference, 1.00 means they move in lockstep and 0 means no relationship.

Why it happens:

• The S&P 500 is roughly 80% of the total US market by value, so VTI is mostly VOO plus a thin slice of mid and small caps.
• QQQ's biggest holdings are the same mega-cap tech names that sit at the top of VOO.

The part that surprised me: individual mega-caps correlated less with each other than the funds holding them. AAPL / NVDA came out at 0.21 and AAPL / MSFT at 0.36 over the same window. The index funds average away the differences between their own top holdings.

Caveats:

• Two years is a short window and was mostly a bull market.
• Correlations tend to rise toward 1 in sharp sell-offs, which is exactly when you'd want them low.
• None of this makes QQQ wrong. It's a deliberate large-cap growth tilt, just not a diversifier.

For people who hold a VTI/VOO core, what have you added that actually moved your correlations down? International, bonds, small-cap value, something else?

Edit: fair pushback. VOO + VTI together is less common than I implied, and most people here pick one. The more useful part is VOO/QQQ at 0.88, and that the individual mega-caps correlate less with each other than the funds holding them.

Any thought ? Thanks

Hi everyone,

anyone know what's happening here?

https://www.justetf.com/en/etf-profile.html?isin=LU1829219390

ETFs shouldn't (can't) do that, this is just banking titles, unless the banking industry just completely collapsed at once. But we would have heard about that.

Just wondering if some of you also have a small percentage of these in your portfolio. Just added with the recent drop.

Hello guys,

I’m 27 years old and fairly new to ETF investing. My target horizon is 10+ years, and I plan to DCA consistently.

Currently, my portfolio is split like this:

• VOO (50%)
• QQQM (25%)
• VTV (25%)

Admittedly, I picked these three with minimal initial research. After diving deeper, I realized there is massive holding overlap between them (80-85% overlap between VOO/QQQM and VOO/VTV). Basically, my 25% Growth (QQQM) and 25% Value (VTV) tilts are just cancelling each other out against VOO, leaving me with a complex 100% US Large Cap setup.

I'm looking to streamline and fix this overlap. Here are the two main options I'm considering:

• Option 1 (Pure Growth & Value Barbell): Drop VOO completely and run 50% QQQM + 50% VTV. This cleans up the overlap to near zero while keeping a defined split between tech/growth and old economy value.
• Option 2 (Adding Small Cap Value): Drop VOO and run QQQM + VTV + AVUV From what I've seen, AVUV has solid returns and could be great for a long-term hold.

My questions for you guys:

1. Does skipping VOO for a pure QQQM + VTV split make sense, or is holding 100% VOO just objectively better for simplicity?
2. If you hold AVUV, how much of your portfolio do you actually give it?
3. Would you recommend adding international exposure (like VXUS) at my age, or sticking purely to US equity because of the better return?

Appreciate any feedback or insights! Thanks!

I've been doing research on ETFs for a few weeks now. It's been incredibly overwhelming, and there doesn't seem to be a common consensus on what a good portfolio looks like, but I want to at least make sure my plan is not trash. I am 19 and am set through my state job to retire at 49. I am now starting my investment journey because I want to retire well. I want to start risky and shift to a more stable spread closer to retirement. This will be my Roth IRA portfolio pie. 40% SPMO, 30% VGT, 20% DGRO, and 10% VOO. SPMO has the highest expense ratio at 0.13%, but I really like the idea of a momentum ETF, and it has performed pretty well over the last decade. I am well aware of the "past profit doesn't dictate future performance" quote or whatever people like to throw around, but past performance is the best thing I have to go off of. VTG has been incredibly profitable over the last two decades, but I am not the biggest fan of thematic ETFs. basing the majority of my portfolio on one set sector (in this case technology) makes me a little wary of it. I'm aware SPMO is also majority tech, but that's only because it the most profitable sector currently. DGRO seems to be comfortably diverse with their top ten holdings being only 27.05% of their total assets. it also seems to have been fairly stable through past dips compared to others in my planned portfolio. and finally, VOO because... I mean... its VOO. It's the set it and forget it ETF. I know there is a lot of overlap with this ETF and my others, but it gives me the comfort of being the big 500. the only thing I personally think I need to add is an ETF with more international diversity. but I'm pretty much a noob when it comes to investing so that's where you guys come in. Are these ETFs even worth investing in together? please let me know your thoughts.