r/dividends • • Mar 26 '21

README Welcome to r/dividends [NEW USERS/BEGINNER INVESTORS START HERE]

3.2k Upvotes

[This post is designed to serve as an introduction to new users of the subreddit, based on my own personal experience. Please read this post in its entirety before contributing to the subreddit, as it answers 95% of the questions most commonly asked by new users and investors. The Moderation Team will remove any submission that asks a question answered by this post. Nothing in this piece should be taken as legally binding financial advice. Even though citations have been included, please do your own research. While I ( u/Firstclass30 ) am the lead moderator of the r/dividends subreddit, I am not a licensed financial advisor.]

Good afternoon, and welcome to r/dividends. We are a community by and for dividend growth investors. Our community was started all the way back in 2009 as a discussion forum for dividend investors. Whether you are just starting out in your investing journey, or are months away from retirement, we hope you will find enjoyment in participating with this online community. This post will go over absolutely everything you need to get started in the world of dividend investing. Whether you are new or have been investing for years, it is well worth a read.

Part 0: What are dividends exactly?

From Investopedia:

A dividend is the distribution of some of a company's earnings to a class of its shareholders, as determined by its board of directors. Common shareholders of dividend-paying companies are typically eligible as long as they own the stock before the ex-dividend date. Dividends may be paid out as cash or in the form of additional stock.[1]

Dividend investors are those who incorporate dividend payers into their portfolio.

Part I: Understanding the benefits and drawbacks of dividend payers

Dividend payers tend to be big, well-established companies that have an abundance of cash. According to Steve Greiner, Vice President of Charles Schwab Equity Ratings®, "They [dividend payers] often can't compete with the rapid appreciation of fledgling, fast-growing companies, so they use dividend payouts as an enticement." Because of this, many newer investors often think of dividend payers as being the opposite of so-called "growth stocks." In reality, it is usually dividend-paying securities that produce more growth over a long period of time.

Dividends, when reinvested, can significantly boost total returns over time, making dividend-paying stocks an attractive option for older and younger investors alike. For example, if you invested $1,000 USD in a hypothetical investment that tracked the S&P 500 Index on January 1, 1990, but did not reinvest the dividends, your investment would have been worth $8,982 USD at the end of 2019. If you had reinvested the dividends, you would have ended up with $16,971 - nearly doubling your returns. The longer the timeframe, the more dramatic the disparity. According to research conducted by the Hartford Funds, "Dividends have played a significant role in the returns investors have received during the past 50 years. Going back to 1970, a whopping 84% of the total return of the S&P 500 index can be attributed to reinvested dividends and the power of compounding."[2] Drawing from the decades of data available, intentionally excluding dividends from your portfolio could result in significantly handicapping your portfolio for decades.

With the S&P 500 yielding approximately 1.52% as of December 31, 2020, dividends paying securities can serve as an attractive alternative to Treasuries and other fixed income investments often pushed by professional retirement planners.

The downside to dividends is that they are not guaranteed. This is important information to consider, as companies can and will stop paying dividends if necessary, or worse, if legally required. Certain market conditions like the 2020 coronavirus pandemic can create an uncertain environment for dividend-focused companies. In 2020, 68 of the roughly 380 dividend-paying companies in the S&P 500 suspended or reduced their payouts.[4]

Fortunately, companies generally only cut their dividends when they are in distress, so favoring those with sound financial metrics can help mitigate the risk.

Part II: Understanding how to pick dividend stocks

If you create a post in the r/dividends subreddit asking for a list of good companies that pay dividends, your submission will be removed. This is because this community believes firmly in the "teach someone to fish" mentality. Instead of asking for a list of dividend payers, it is far more valuable instead to understand the fundamental ideas behind why specific individuals choose specific companies. By knowing and understanding these principles, you can build your own portfolio that, if properly executed, could beat 90% of lay investors with relatively little effort. While far from comprehensive, these six tips can help you identify dividend-paying stocks with strong financial health.

#1. Do not chase high dividend yields: If a company has a high dividend yield, there is always a reason (most of the time not a good one) that a security is offering payouts that are well above average. A good rule of thumb is that before you purchase a high-yield security (those with a yield of 5% or more), try to determine why it is so high. It is important to note however, that the dividend yield is not a fixed amount, but in reality changes every second a stock is traded. According to Investopedia:

The dividend yield, expressed as a percentage, is a financial ratio (dividend/price) that shows how much a company pays out in dividends each year relative to its stock price.[3]

If a high or rising yield is due to a shrinking share price, that is a bad sign and could indicate that a dividend cut is in a company's future. However, if a rising dividend yield is due to rising profits, that indicates a more favorable scenario. When net profits rise, dividends tend to follow suit. Make sure you know exactly what is causing the increase before buying the stock.

#2. Assess the payout ratio: This metric (calculated by dividing dividends per share over earnings per share) tells you how much of a company's earnings are going toward the dividend. A ratio higher than 100% means the company is paying out more to its shareholders than it is earning. In such cases, it may be able to cover its dividends from available cash, but that can only last for so long.

If a company whose stock you own is losing money but still paying a dividend for an extended period, it may be time to sell off and cut your losses. US tax law allows you to write off up to $3,000 per year in capital losses in exchange for a tax credit. Your circumstances may vary, so check your local tax authority. The reason you may want to consider this option is because dividend payers in financial hard times may try to stave off a dividend cut by funding payouts with borrowed funds or cash reserves. These actions will often drive away shareholders, forcing the share price down. History also shows these actions rarely turn things around, and are usually just delaying the inevitable. (To those of you who know about REITs, keep reading, they will be addressed further down.

#3. Check the balance sheet: High levels of debt represent a competing use of cash. Under most global securities laws, a company must pay its creditors before it pays its dividends. A fast-rising level of debt could indicate bankruptcy in the short or medium-term future. Under US and EU bankruptcy law, corporations in the bankruptcy process are (depending on the circumstances) legally barred from paying dividends to shareholders. Corporations with high debt levels may also look to the courts to assist in reorganizing debts without declaring bankruptcy. Oftentimes, judges in these cases will force reductions or suspensions in dividend payments to prioritize the repayment of creditors.

#4. Look for dividend growth: Generally speaking, you want to find companies that not only pay steady dividends, but also increase them at regular intervals (i.e. once per year over the past three, five, or even 10 years. Research has also shown that companies that grow their dividends tend to outperform their peers over time.[2] Not only that, but a strong history of regular dividend growth also helps keep pace with inflation, which is particularly valuable to those who wish to seek financial independence and live off of their investments.

With that being said, just because a company did not increase their dividends in 2020 or 2021 does not make it necessarily worthy of exclusion from your portfolio. Certain industries (like the top US banks) were legally prohibited by the federal government from raising their dividends during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most companies have been hoarding cash to help weather the economic uncertainty, so it is not unreasonable to for them to keep dividends stagnant until the economy bounces back. When it comes to companies impacted by the pandemic, look for other factors aside from dividend changes to determine whether or not the company is worth your investment.

#5. Understand sector risk: Some sectors offer a more attractive combination of dividends and growth than others, but they also offer different risk characteristics that you should consider when researching dividend payers for your portfolio. Stocks from the banking, consumer staples, and utilities sectors, for example, are known for steady dividends and lower volatility, but they also tend to offer less growth potential (though this varies from company to company). Dividend paying tech companies, on the other hand, could offer attractive dividends along with the opportunity for larger price gains, but they also tend to be much more volatile. If you are a long-term investor, you might be willing to accept tech's higher volatility in exchange for its growth and income prospects, but if you are nearing or in retirement, you might want to prioritize dividend-payers from less volatile industries.

#6. Consider a fund: If you are worried the potential for price declines eroding the value of your dividend stocks, consider instead a dividend-focused exchange traded fund (ETF) or mutual fund. Such funds typically hold stocks that have a history of distributing dividends to their shareholders, and they provide a greater level of diversification than you can achieve by buying a handful of dividend paying stocks. Funds are typically preferred by those who wish to take a more hands-off approach to their investments. These will be your best option if you lack the time or inclination to conduct in-depth research of companies.

Part III: Ideal age of the dividend investor.

Oftentimes inexperienced investors will claim dividends are for those at or nearing retirement. As was demonstrated earlier in this piece, nothing could be further from the truth. No matter what stage of your life or investing career, dividend-paying stocks can be a great way to supplement or even replace your income and improve your portfolio's growth potential. Just be sure you research their overall financial health, not just their dividend rates, before investing. There is no such thing as a right or wrong decision, as long as you achieve your desired outcome.

Part IV: When not to reinvest

Part I demonstrated how powerful reinvesting one's dividends can be, but there are certain circumstances where it can be more financially savvy to refrain from reinvesting your dividends. Below are three situations in which you might want to deploy dividend payouts elsewhere.

  • You are in or near retirement: When you are living off your savings, taking income from your dividends allows you to let more of your portfolio stay invested for growth. If you are nearing retirement, on the other hand, you can use the payouts to build up your cash and short-term reserves as you prepare for the transition to life after work. Some dividend investors have even built their portfolios to have their dividends cover 100% of their expenses.
  • Your portfolio is out of balance: Reinvesting the dividends of a well-performing investment back into that investment can throw your portfolio off balance over time. In such cases, you might want to take the cash and reinvest it elsewhere.
  • The investment is underperforming: If you are worried about an investment's future prospects but are not quite ready to let it go, you may not want to reinvest the payouts back into that investment. Instead, you might use the dividends to dip your toe into something prospective that could ultimately replace the underperforming investment.

Part V: Understanding Taxes on your portfolio

The question of taxes often comes up a lot in investing communities, and r/dividends is no exception. However, we mods prohibit direct questions regarding taxes and other questions of legality because nobody here is a licensed tax professional in every single tax jurisdiction on Earth. The question of taxes varies so wildly between regions that even making basic generalizations borders on pointless. The only constant is that you will pay taxes at some point in your life on your investments. Whether it is before you make your gains, after you make your gains, or somewhere in between, you will pay taxes. The different types of accounts and options available to you varies based on your income, geography, employer, and dozens of other factors. Some countries offer special accounts for those who serve in the military, law enforcement, or some other specialized profession(s). Some trade unions help pay the taxes you may owe on certain investment types. The variations on the tax question are so all over the place that I could break Reddit's character limit just covering the most general details.

Typically the best resource for understanding your local tax situation is the government agenc(ies) responsible for collecting your money. As of 2021, most all have websites of various levels of usability. They should often be your first stop for most questions. When in doubt, always talk to a professional.

Part VI: Special Snowflake companies (REITS, MLPs, royalty trusts, etc.)

Some companies do not fit neatly into the category of an S-class corporation, and see themselves as special snowflakes worthy of a special tax status. Understanding these entities is a critical prerequisite to holding them in your portfolio, as many may require additional tax paperwork. In my personal experience, aside from REITS, most are not worth the time of the average investor. Unless you already have a preexisting knowledge of how these companies work, I would not go out of your way to understand in-depth how they operate when there are so many options out there that could provide better returns.

The only exception to this rule is the Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT). Unlike other special snowflake investments, REITs are relatively self explanatory. They deal 100% in real estate. Nothing else. REITs are favored by dividend investors because of their special arrangement with the US government. In exchange for not having to pay most federal corporate taxes, REITs are legally required to pass on at minimum 90% of their profits under GAAP to shareholders in the form of dividends, which are taxed as income by the US government. The keyword here is GAAP.

Most places on Earth (aka the United States and almost nobody else) requires the usage of the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (or GAAP standard of accounting). GAAP is incredibly strict, intricate, complicated, and almost impossible to cheat. 100% of publicly traded companies in the US use GAAP, which makes comparing the finances of US stocks incredibly easy. However, the tax structure of Real Estate Investment trusts often causes the math behind GAAP (or any other accounting system for that matter) to break down. This can make REIT payout ratios look absolutely insane in relation to other companies, and can make most REITs look incredibly unprofitable. To combat this, REITs have developed their own standards utilizing simplified math, called the funds from operations (FFO) metrics. I originally had a more in-depth explanation of this concept (as well as information about BDCs, MLPs, and Royalty Trusts), but I had to cut it out of the final draft of this post because Reddit has a 40,000 character limit. The best I can do right now is to point you in the direction of Investopedia, which has an excellent article on the subject of FFOs, linked here.

The decision of whether or not to incorporate these types of investments into your portfolio is a personal one, and just like with any other type of investment, varies greatly based on your risk tolerance and portfolio goals.

Part VII: Performing in-depth research on companies

While anyone can read a balance sheet synopsis on Seeking Alpha and vaguely grasp its meaning, above understanding a concept is the ability to put one's knowledge into practice. The reason I put this skill above actually picking companies is because stock picking can be done with a relatively low knowledge base, but actually digging deep into financial statements and balance sheets to discover companies on your own not on the traditional press circuit can serve as the true test of someone's research potential.

Oftentimes I come across even experienced investors unaware of just how many resources are available to them on this front. While websites, apps, and YouTube channels exist all over the place, an often underutilized resource for investment knowledge is the companies themselves. 99% of publicly traded companies have a website dedicated to serving the needs of investors, often with email addresses, phone numbers, and physical addresses just begging to be contacted. How much did Coca-Cola pay in dividends in 1926? Google doesn't know (I checked), but I guarantee you somewhere in an Atlanta filing cabinet lies Coke's dividend history from back in that time. It is obscure, seemingly random knowledge like that investor relations experts are paid to answer.

[Side note: originally, there was going to be a far larger expanded section about this, but it was cut for the sake of conforming to Reddit's character limit.]

Part VIII: Diminishing returns and micromanagement

By paying attention in school, you may have been informed regarding the law of diminishing returns. When it comes to dividend investing (or any type of investing), the law of diminishing returns can play a big part of your portfolio management. While you should always be on the lookout for investment opportunities, if day trading is the reason you wake up in the morning, dividend investing may not be right for you. Strategies like buying right before the ex-div date and selling immediately afterwards rarely turn out in your favor, and even when they do are often not worth the trouble. Your gain will be a few cents at best, or worse you lose money. In my experience as the lead moderator of this subreddit, monitoring comments, I can say with confidence that most people will lose money on this day-trading type strategy. Most of the price action regarding a dividend took place days or weeks before the ex-dividend date, spread out over a period of time. Companies often issue dividends on a clockwork schedule according to the ISO Calendar, so institutional investors are often able to predict when the dividend will be paid months or even years in advance, long before the boards of these companies officially announce their dividends.

A similar thing can be said for those attempting to buy stocks at the absolute lowest possible price. I have seen individuals hold out for days waiting for a few extra cents. If you have a six figure portfolio, you do not need to be trying to time a 12 cent price drop. Your time will be better spent elsewhere. Understanding the law of diminishing returns can sometimes singlehandedly turn an underperforming portfolio into an overperforming one. By taking a hands off approach to most of your investments, you let the market work in the background of your life. As the old saying goes, "time in the market beats timing the market every day of the week."

Part IX: Debt and financing your investments

Early in your investment journey, the idea of purchasing dividend stocks on debt sounds like a great idea. Buy the stocks, use the dividends to pay off the loan, then keep the stocks and profit. It sounds foolproof right up until it isn't. What seems like free money is more akin to an advance on a sh***y record deal. If you decide to take out a $50,000 loan to buy dividend stocks, don't be surprised if acquiring a home or auto loan becomes significantly more difficult or downright impossible depending on your circumstances. Banks and credit unions are often far more hesitant to lend out money to those with high amounts of preexisting debt. When these loans are given however, they often come with interest rates higher than what you would have normally had to pay if you had not decided to buy a bunch of AT&T with a personal loan. Any amount below $20,000 will hardly have a significant effect on your long-term portfolio (assuming you are still investing with earned income), and any amount above $20,000 could have serious ramifications on your ability to access credit in the event you truly need it. If you fail to disclose this preexisting loan to any prospective lender, then congratulations, you have just committed fraud, which is something we do not condone here on r/dividends.

Your income and lifestyle should be sufficient to fund your investment needs. While I understand the frustration that can come with being a student with 0 disposable income, being a student is actually the best possible reason not to have a five-figure unsecured debt load. As someone with a degree in Management and a career in the field, I can tell you that many employers conduct background and credit checks on prospective employees (though credit checks on employees are illegal in certain states). A $20,000 personal loan made by a 20 year old raises a lot of red flags, and while it could signal personal illness or medical debt, it could signal a gambling problem. When you tell them you used the money to buy stocks, they will immediately assume gambling problem. Good things come to those who wait.

Part X: Brokerages and celebrity portfolios

If you came to this post or subreddit looking for nothing but a brokerage recommendation, I recommend you look elsewhere. While my wife and I personally use M1 Finance, and I do recommend it to friends and family, I have no idea who is reading this post. I know only what information Reddit gives me as a moderator, so I will say that for the love of whatever you believe in do not choose a brokerage just because some internet personality, or some random person on Reddit told you about it. Brokerages are not interchangeable, and they offer wildly different features and benefits. I like M1 because of the ability to form pies. This for example is my personal portfolio. I enjoy what I enjoy about M1, and what it is able to offer me and my family. Your situation is (likely) different. This is also the reason we explicitly ban referral links on r/dividends. The only recommendation I will issue is do not invest with Robinhood. Other than that, go nuts.

Part XI: Beyond dividends, and knowing when not to invest.

Equally important to the skills of investing are the skills of knowing when not to invest. If you have credit card debt, pay that off first, and make sure to pay 100% of your balance every month. If you do not have an emergency fund, create one. It should consist of roughly six months worth of expenses. If you lack a financial plan or budget, create one. My wife and I use Mint.com for our budget. We sync it with our cards, and everything comes out perfectly. I highly recommend it.

Part XII: Seeking feedback

Saving and investing can become an addiction, so it is important to know when to moderate it. Having a third party provide additional input or opinions on your decisions can work wonders. If you have a significant other or a best friend, I would recommend getting them into the investing mindset, if they are not already. Having a trusted voice to bounce ideas off can lead to not only financial reward, but emotional and intellectual growth.

Since I took over this subreddit in August 2020, I have strived to create that environment here. It is from this base framework that I am hoping future discussions in this community can branch from. If you are just joining us, or have been with this community for years, I thank you for joining us on r/dividends.

Happy investing,

u/Firstclass30

[This post was inspired by an article in Charles Schwab's Spring 2021 Investment magazine. The article was titled "Rx for what ails you. Dividend-paying stocks could be just what the doctor ordered." The research it presented served as the inspiration and backbone of the first half of this piece. Other works found through my own research constituted the majority of the factual content of this piece. The majority of this post's contents are my personal opinions, and should not be taken as financial advice. Invest at your own risk. Recommendation or mention of a security or service does not constitute an endorsement. I received no compensation from any individual or group for writing this post.]

[The first draft of this post was over 50,000 characters long, and exceeded Reddit's character limit by more than 25%. For the sake of brevity and my own sense of perfectionism, this post's length was cut in half. As of original publication it contains over 4,100 words, with over 26,000 characters.]

Edit: This piece was originally written in Microsoft Word, and copied over to Reddit. A few formatting errors slipped through by mistake, and those were corrected after publication.


r/dividends • • 2d ago

Megathread Rate My Portfolio

8 Upvotes

This daily thread serves as the home for all "Rate My Portfolio" questions, as well as any other generic questions such as "What do you think of XYZ," that would otherwise violate community rules.

To better tailor advice, please include such context as age, goals, timeline, risk tolerance, and any restrictions you may have. Such restrictions may include ethics, morals, work restrictions, etc.

As a reminder, all Rate My Portfolio posts are prohibited under Rule 1 Submission Guidelines. All general stock questions that don't include quality insight from OP are prohibited under Rule 4 Solicitations for Due Diligence. Please keep all such questions to the daily thread, and report and violations under their respective rule.


r/dividends • • 9h ago

Discussion SPY Has Beat Top Dividend Appreciation ETFs Over Last 5 Years

17 Upvotes

I've been looking at the long-term charts recently and noticed that SPY has generally outperformed a lot of the popular dividend appreciation ETFs like VIG, SCHD, or DGRO over the last 5 years with dividends included.

I’m curious, for those of you who prefer dividend appreciation funds over a standard S&P 500 index, what is your main strategy?

Is the goal to build a cash-flow stream so you never have to sell shares (and avoid capital gains taxes) down the road? Or is it more about peace of mind and having a smoother ride during market downturns? Thanks!


r/dividends • • 16h ago

Personal Goal Status update of my dividend journey

Thumbnail gallery
47 Upvotes

Remember me?

https://www.reddit.com/r/dividends/s/ICTboJN4nj

Almost 6 months have passed. Snowball is growing, holding ETFs and not selling them pays off.

I'm at almost 10k passive income per year.

The plan is to reach 300k in ETFs next year.

Must admit that boring strategy is just working.


r/dividends • • 10h ago

Seeking Advice Where are you putting your rainy day funds?

Thumbnail
8 Upvotes

r/dividends • • 17h ago

Discussion ARCC to buy MFIC

18 Upvotes

ARCC (largest trading BDC) is buying MFIC for $1.21 in cash and $9.67 in stock. I'm an owner of MFIC, will most likely sell soon, in a press release there was talk of the purchase price being effected by an MFIC special dividend, I might hang around and see what that's about. I'm going to end up losing money on the MFIC purchase and my dividend will be decreased with the purchase, but we saw a 20% plus bump today.


r/dividends • • 20h ago

Discussion How does UPS at 6.5% look?

29 Upvotes

Someone posted here that UPS was one of the top dividend stocks, I saw that it had dropped from 120 to 90, so I am testing it out. Got lucky, $105 now. Would you cash out, hold, buy more? IRA money, so no tax issues.

10/01/2026  Buy  UPS 200 sh. $94.055  


r/dividends • • 22h ago

Due Diligence 11 SCHD holdings have ALREADY raised their Q4 dividends, and some big names haven't even announced yet. Is a huge SCHD raise coming?

Thumbnail
24 Upvotes

r/dividends • • 1d ago

Due Diligence Coca Cola (KO) Q3 earnings

Post image
53 Upvotes

r/dividends • • 1d ago

Discussion Grow the snowball - Growth-to-Income conversion strategy SCHG to SCHD

25 Upvotes

Taxable brokerage, New money, total income below 0% LTCG threshold, cash buffer in HYSA:

Invest:

$100k is SCHG

$100k in SCHD

After 1 year, take the gains/growth from SCHG strategically/annually, sell and buy shares of SCHD.

Retired early (bridge years), but not living on dividends yet...DRIP is on for both ETFs.

Goal is to maximize dividends in order to turn DRIP off for SCHD and live off the dividends.

Good idea or stupid?


r/dividends • • 23h ago

Discussion I backtested an equal mix of the six most-discussed dividend ETFs against SPY over 10 years. It lost by about $11,600 per $10k, but not on every measure.

17 Upvotes

I kept seeing SCHD, VYM, DGRO, VIG, HDV and NOBL recommended here, so I put an equal-weight mix of all six against SPY. Monthly data, September 2016 to September 2026, rebalanced monthly.

Dividend mix SPY
$10,000 became $29,678 $41,286
Annual return (CAGR) 11.5% 15.2%
Volatility 14.1% 15.3%
Worst drop 22.2% 23.9%
Sharpe ratio 0.63 0.81

What stood out:

  • The dividend mix trailed by almost 4 points a year. My guess is most of that is the last decade's mega-cap tech run, which dividend screens largely exclude.
  • It was only slightly smoother. Volatility was 1.2 points lower and the worst drop (early 2020) was 1.7 points shallower. Less protection than I expected.
  • The equal mix landed close to what you'd expect from any one of them. Several hold many of the same large dividend payers.

Caveats: one 10-year window that strongly favored growth. A decade led by value could flip this. And if you're living on the income, total return isn't the only thing that matters.

For those holding several of these: what's your reason for more than one? Different screens, income stability, or something else?


r/dividends • • 18h ago

Other OVQ is trading

6 Upvotes

For those who don't know, OVQ from Liquid Strategies is live on the market since the 23rd.


r/dividends • • 1d ago

Discussion WHR is why you have to be careful with single stock exposure.

20 Upvotes

There has been worse, but this one has been on decline for such a long time, wondering if company will survive.


r/dividends • • 23h ago

Seeking Advice MFHIX - risky dividend chase or does it have a place in a portfolio?

7 Upvotes

I’ve done a tiny bit of research into junk bonds. What are all of your opinions on MFHIX if your main strategy is funded and taken care of and you have some left over cash to look into a more risky gamble?


r/dividends • • 1d ago

Discussion What do we think about ARCC Q3 results?

7 Upvotes

earnings fell year over year, NAV decreased and net income per share is lower than the dividend. Is it still worth investing?


r/dividends • • 1d ago

Discussion New to Investing, branching out from Dividends to Growth.

25 Upvotes

So before we begin, I'd like to point out that my Portfolio has less than $5,000 in value. I'm very new to the Investing World, I'm very excited to learn new concepts, and I'm happy to say I understand "half" the things being thrown at me when 6 months ago I was wearing headgear to protect my noggin' from all the flying debris being thrown.

So, in a nutshell? I invest $150 a month into SCHD. Already sitting on $1,000 in equity.
All hail SCHD.
All Glory to the Hypnotoad of Dividend ETFs.

However, I recently started investing in VYM as well at around $100 a month.
(Record Scratch)
And I lose people at this point. Stay with me, I'm not finished.
I really want VYM to co-exist alongside my SCHD Shares.

Worse comes to Worst, I can always sell VYM and call a loss a loss, but I'm hopeful and perhaps a tad stubborn. I could just invest in SCHD and call it a day, but I can't get over this hunch that I need to diversify further, and VYM feels like the solution. But I've been warned about Overlap with VOO, a holding I consider "critical" at my older age of 37.

What if I invested in VGT instead of VOO, or perhaps did $50/$50 VOO/VGT instead of all $100 per month for VOO? What do you guys think? Should I try VYM for a year and make that decision for myself later?

Thank you for your time and patience.


r/dividends • • 1d ago

Discussion F and T stocks in the dumpster

86 Upvotes

I got clobbered, on paper, with my IRA holdings Ford and AT&T, but both have buy ratings at Schwab. Looks like earnings cover the 5% dividends easily. Buy more or bail out?


r/dividends • • 1d ago

Opinion What are people’s top picks?

30 Upvotes

Hey all, after some wisdom from seasoned dividend investors please:

  1. What are everyone’s 3-5 top picks for dividends investing?

  2. What have been the best-paying and most consistent earners for you?

  3. If you had to build a portfolio from scratch, what would you include/exclude and what % return would you target (build a great portfolio, according to you)?

  4. Has anyone had luck with crazy big dividend companies eg Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP) %30-35?

Thanks!


r/dividends • • 1d ago

Discussion SPYD's Top 20 Holdings: Sector, Dividend Yield & Income Contribution

Post image
14 Upvotes

Methodology

Estimated dividend income contribution is calculated as:

Holding portfolio weight × Holding dividend yield ÷ ETF dividend yield

Sector contributions are the sum of the estimated income contributions of the displayed holdings within each sector.

The percentages represent estimated contributions to the entire ETF's dividend income, not just the 20 holdings shown.


r/dividends • • 2d ago

Discussion Is 50/50 SCHG/SCHD too simple for a new dividend investor?

73 Upvotes

When someone new asks me where to start, my default answer is usually 50/50 SCHG/SCHD. Growth on one side, dividend/value on the other, and it keeps things balanced.

I know it's not fancy, and it won't beat everything every year. But for someone just starting, simple and steady seems better than chasing the highest yield.

Curious what you all think: is that too simple, or is simple exactly the point for a beginner?

The two funds have a very low overlap.

Processing img 5j1iz7lt8uxh1...

Processing img fgq6tuay8uxh1...

Performance vs S&P500:

Processing img 87guab3h9uxh1...

Processing img 9cvl05hk9uxh1...


r/dividends • • 1d ago

Other October BTCI Dividend

Post image
15 Upvotes

r/dividends • • 1d ago

Seeking Advice Moved kids' gift money to Fidelity brokerage (529 is already funded). What’s the next step up from SPAXX/FDLXX for a little more risk?

Thumbnail
6 Upvotes

r/dividends • • 1d ago

Discussion 46M. Should I add TXN to my dividend portfolio?

Post image
16 Upvotes

I'm focused on dividend growth and long-term investing. My portfolio includes SCHD, VTI, JNJ, PG, KO, PEP, WM, ABBV, HD, MSFT, AAPL, and a small ARKK position.

I've been looking at TXN because of its dividend growth history, but I'm not sure if adding another individual stock makes sense or if I should keep adding to my ETFs instead.

What do you think? Would TXN be a good fit for my portfolio?


r/dividends • • 1d ago

Discussion oRo (3983.T): Tokyo accounting software with a third of its market cap in net cash, priced as if cash flow shrinks forever

Thumbnail
6 Upvotes

r/dividends • • 1d ago

Other Earnings week · Oct 26

Thumbnail whaleatlas.com
3 Upvotes