I read the original version of Carmilla by Le Fanu for a local book club this month. I've seen it recommended on various sapphic books subreddits quite a bit, so I was excited to read it. However upon reading, I didn't find it that sapphic.
I know this book was written in the 1800s and was risqué and sapphic for the time bc there was nothing else. It think it was just the the qualifying of the feelings.
**Spoilers Ahead**
The narrator, Laura, expresses multiple times that Carmilla's actions make her uncomfortable
For example:
"The remainder of that evening passed without any recurrence of what I called her infatuations. I mean her crazy talk and looks, which embarrassed, and even frightened me."
"Her agitations and her language were unintelligible to me. From these foolish embraces, which were not of very frequent occurrence, I must allow, I used to wish to extricate myself; but my energies seemed to fail me. Her murmured words sounded like a lullaby in my ear, and soothed my resistance into a trance, from which I only seemed to recover myself when she withdrew her arms."
Laura is under a sort of trance that robs her of her free will, but her innate response is one of discomfort and aversion.
And I read Carmilla's yearning and proclamations of love as manipulations and blood lust bc it never stopped her draining of Laura. She was just going to keep at it until she killed Laura like all the rest. Carmilla "loves" for a moment that which sustains her but isn't real love. Carmilla even says she has never loved.
The way I read it, what Carmilla is doing with Laura isn't love. It's savoring a good meal over a couple of weeks...
"The vampire is prone to be fascinated with an engrossing vehemence, resembling the passion of love, by particular persons. In pursuit of these it will exercise inexhaustible patience and stratagem, for access to a particular object may be obstructed in a hundred ways. It will never desist until it has satiated its passion, and drained the very life of its coveted victim. But it will, in these cases, husband and protract its murderous enjoyment with the refinement of an epicure, and heighten it by the gradual approaches of an artful courtship."
If this was the 1800s or if someone is looking to read something old with echoes of sapphic, I would say... yes... read this! Since we are fortunate to have so many wonderful and truly sapphic books now, I would say there are better choices.
Perhaps this unsatisfied feeling that I'm struggling with is why there are so many reimaginings of the original Carmilla.
Did anyone else read this version of Carmila the same way and find it to be less sapphic than expected? If you read this version and thought the feelings of Carmilla and Laura to be true, what specifically in the book made you feel this way?