r/nwi • u/Mr_Fahrenheit73 • 4h ago
Review Vote Baird Out
At the top of my ticket is the race for Indiana’s 4th Congressional District between incumbent Jim Baird (R) and challenger Drew Cox(D) . The more I examine their records and positions, the more questions I believe voters should be asking.
January 6 and election integrity
Following the 2020 election, Jim Baird voted to object to the certified electoral votes from Arizona and Pennsylvania. He subsequently voted against Donald Trump’s second impeachment, an independent January 6 commission, and the House Select Committee investigation.
The war in Iran
Baird has supported President Trump’s military operations against Iran and voted against congressional efforts to require the withdrawal of American forces.
Drew Cox has opposed the war and questioned its objectives.
Campaign financing
As of June 30, 2026, Baird had raised approximately $358,000 for his campaign, including substantial political action committee contributions.
Cox had raised approximately $20,000 and says he does not accept corporate PAC contributions.
This is something I found particularly interesting:
Congressional expense reimbursements
According to a September 30, 2026, Washington Post investigation, Jim Baird claimed more taxpayer funded meals and lodging reimbursements than ANY OTHER MEMBER of the U.S. House in both 2024 and 2025.
TWO YEARS IN A ROW
In 2025 alone, Baird claimed $39,789.
For comparison, fellow Indiana Republican Congressman Rudy Yakym claimed approximately $4,000 during the same year.
Their voting participation rates were remarkably similar:
Jim Baird: 98.3%
Rudy Yakym: 100%
Yet Baird claimed nearly TEN TIMES as much in meals and lodging reimbursements.
For additional context, the average among the 360 House members who participated in the program was approximately $18,600 in 2025. Baird claimed more than TWICE THAT AMOUNT.
Congressional rules permit these reimbursements, and receipts are not required. That right there is total bull but hey, they make their own rules.
These figures do not establish wrongdoing. Voting participation also does not tell us exactly how many days either representative qualified for reimbursement.
Nevertheless, I believe constituents deserve an explanation for such a substantial difference, particularly from an elected official who emphasizes fiscal responsibility.
I encourage everyone to ask questions and make an informed decision on November 3.