​

In my previous post, I asked how likely it was that the monarchy would return to France, but most people told me 0. What's the reason if the republic is literally something new, and besides, France was a great power under both Bonapartes, Napoleon I and Napoleon III?

Specifically the Bonaparte house

Hello everyone!

Lately, I've found myself torn between two political outlooks: democratic socialism and progressive Catholic monarchism. I'm still trying to work out where I stand, so I thought this community might offer some interesting perspectives.

What appeals to me about democratic socialism is its emphasis on social justice. I believe that a decent society should protect the vulnerable, provide people with access to healthcare and education, defend workers' rights, and ensure that human dignity means more than simply having equal rights on paper. At the same time, I'm not particularly attracted to political movements that treat religion and tradition as obstacles to progress.

As a Catholic, I find the Church's social teaching — particularly its emphasis on solidarity, human dignity and the common good — compelling. I believe that a society should be judged not only by its prosperity, but also by how it treats those who have the least.

This is partly what draws me towards monarchism. The idea of a Crown standing above party politics, representing national continuity and a sense of duty beyond electoral cycles, genuinely appeals to me. I like the idea of public authority being understood as a responsibility to serve rather than merely an opportunity to exercise power.

Nevertheless, I have some serious reservations.

Why should someone inherit a position of constitutional importance rather than earn it through democratic elections? Can hereditary monarchy really be reconciled with political equality? And, perhaps most importantly, what can a constitutional monarchy offer a modern democratic society that a well-functioning republic cannot?

I'm not interested in arguments based purely on nostalgia, royal pageantry or the romanticisation of the past. I want to understand whether monarchy has a convincing philosophical and practical justification in the twenty-first century.

So here's my challenge to the monarchists of this subreddit: convince me.

Give me your strongest arguments, whether philosophical, historical, constitutional or rooted in Catholic political thought. Explain why monarchy is worth defending, how it can serve ordinary people, and why its advantages might outweigh its inherent problems.

I'm particularly interested in hearing from those who support constitutional government, social responsibility and the welfare of the people, rather than those who defend monarchy simply because they admire royal families.

I'm genuinely undecided, and I'm willing to have my views challenged. Perhaps the arguments presented here will help me understand where I truly stand.

Thank you for reading. I look forward to a thoughtful and cordial discussion!

(NO HATE/DRAMA TO PEOPLE FROM THESE COUNTRIES BTW, I STILL RESPECT YOU. JUST ASKING THIS OUT OF CURIOSITY)

Recently (well maybe for about 2 years) I was doing research on how monarchies are viewed across different countries overtime based upon surveys/public polls, people from these countries voicing their opinions on monarchy and this one has really surprised and confused me. Portugal went from being one of the least popular countries in Europe for monarchiak support to having a large share of pro-monarchist people and Georgia on the other hand has became very anti-monarchist. Older polls seem to suggest the opposite. For example, a poll from early 2010 showed only 11% supported monarchy; see https://web.archive.org/web/20230305221846/https://www.dn.pt/portugal/portugueses-optam-com-clareza-pela-republica-1518829.html . Whereas older surveys for Georgia was more than half of the population; see https://www.messenger.com.ge/issues/1469_october_23_2007/n_1469_brief.html from 2007. Then when I searched modern opinions, the Georgians I saw were very much against the concept of a monarchy and monarchism in general is rarely mentioned in Georgia whereas the Portuguese I've seen/met seem to be "not as opposed" (if you get what I mean). Furthermore from an OFFICIAL subreddit for Portugal, people were basically implying the country would have been better off being a monarchy; see https://www.reddit.com/r/portugal/s/yUIPEr8NF6 . Whereas in the OFFICAL subreddit for Georgia (not trying to bring drama btw, just using this as evidence for my thought), people were very opposed to monarchy being restored in the country and implied support is basically minimal; see https://www.reddit.com/r/Sakartvelo/s/E9qhApYIfS . So I am not rying to defame either countries just to clarify, I really like both however can people from either countries or those who know them well explain to me why Portugal has changed so much for monarchy popularity yet the opposite happened in Georgia? For Georgia I THINK (?) it has something to do with the former President (currently disputed president?) losing popularity but Portugal really shocked me.

1. Emperors
   
2. Empress consorts
   3-5. Princes and princesses by marriage