r/Libertarian • u/kidmock • 19h ago
Philosophy Can you help me reconcile my free speech hypocrisy?
Philosophically, I'm a free speech absolutist. I believe that people should be able to say what they want without fear of government intrusion.
I also believe that people should be free to make their own decisions without coercion. That they can consume whatever they want or exchange products and services with whomever they choose.
However, I can't help but think that vices should not be encouraged or advertised.
I would like to see an end to advertising drugs. That is all perscription and recreational drugs including alcohol, tobacco, etc. I would like to see an end to gambling ads including the lotteries. And so on.
I'm fine with these products and services existing. I'm fine with them being legal. I'm fine with people openly discussing them. I just don't think direct to consumer advertsing is a good thing.
How do I square this view of an advertsing ban under my philosohical view of free speech? Or, is it just a paradox, I have to accept.
--
This post is intended to be a philosophical discussion centered around limiting advertising and free speech not a policy prescription. While I thought that was clear, many comments are missing this key point. I'm not proposing policy or advocating for the ban of any product or service. You do you.