r/GenderCynical • u/CLOWTWO • 1d ago
r/GenderCynical • u/Ebomb1 • Mar 09 '20
Updated Rules and FAQ!
Hello, GenCynners!
It's time again to make some clarifications and revisions to our rules and FAQ. Most of these things have been unofficial policy for a while and older users osmosed and generally followed them. But we keep growing, and so we need to make some things more explicit for new users, both to keep us out of trouble with the admins and to cut down on modding work. Rules for posting and participation have been updated and expanded in the FAQ and sidebar.
We've made more explicit what does (TERF/GC content) and does not (general transphobia) qualify for posting, how posts must be formatted, and expectations for conduct while commenting.
The biggest changes are clarifying under what circumstances you can interact with GC users and subs and still participate here. We've tried to cover all the circumstances under which you might encounter or interact with GC content.
Actions to avoid on GenCyn:
- Posting content that includes something you posted on a GC sub
- Linking or c/ping something you posted on a GC sub
- Posting about how a GC sub banned you. We don't care.
- Commenting about your urges to crash a GC sub, e.g. "I feel like giving them a piece of my mind."
- Alluding to your actions on a GC sub in GenCyn, e.g. "Yeah, I just had to tell them how wrong they were."
- Encouraging anyone else's participation, e.g. "Do it and report back," or, "Everyone should go over there and ___."
Actions to avoid wrt GC subs and users:
- Do not follow something you saw on GenCyn to a GC sub to engage with GC users in an attempt to educate them
- Do not follow something you saw on GenCyn to a GC sub to participate because you "believe in hearing both sides" or want to "play devil's advocate."
- Do not follow something you saw on GenCyn to a GC sub to argue with GC users or get in a zinger to make yourself feel better
- Do not follow something you saw on GenCyn to a GC sub to up or downvote posts or comments
Official GenCyn policy has been to discourage engagement with GC users across the board. There's been a sharp uptick in users crossing the streams, and in behaviors that violate reddit's brigading rules. A first offense for the above behaviors will be a temp ban. The second is a permaban. We've also disabled crossposting and are going to be paying more attention to .np linking.
We cannot literally stop you from engaging with GC. But we will protect the sub from accusations of brigading, and we will moderate to maintain the intention of the sub, which is and has always been to catalogue, laugh, and vent about GC-flavored transphobia, not to win hearts and minds or score internet arguing points.
As always, if you find that reading r/GenderCynical is getting to you, take a break and take care of yourself.
r/GenderCynical • u/Ebomb1 • Jan 15 '25
Mod Post: A reminder about content rules for this sub
We've been seeing a lot of submissions lately that fall under the category of general bigotry and have no trans content. Please remember: posts need to contain examples of transphobia and they must clearly be sourced from or closely linked to the GC sphere. "GC person is racist," doesn't qualify by itself. Neither does, "Rando MAGA says something violently transphobic."
The situation in the US is weird af right now, to say nothing of the ongoing shit everywhere else too. There's plenty of content that fits the bill for here, so let's keep it on topic. Thanks.
r/GenderCynical • u/pearkeet • 2d ago
centrist idiot writes a wishy-washy article that still supports trans people in the end. TERFs flip the fuck out
r/GenderCynical • u/SergeantScoria • 3d ago
When you try to make EVERYTHING about biology
r/GenderCynical • u/addictedtoketamine2 • 3d ago
PITT parent seethes and copes that their daughter found a happy and fulfilling t4t relationship. Some highlights!
r/GenderCynical • u/OrneryPerformance604 • 4d ago
TERFs calling to torture and execute a trans person
r/GenderCynical • u/questioner-6345 • 5d ago
A practical guide to doing conversion therapy on your coworkers
Never argue with them or try to engage in a fact based discussion. Instead, politely but firmly misgender them at every opportunity, and ask lots of leading questions while refusing to ever actually make your point. This will make you seem like a reasonable and unbiased person to rely on when they surely, one day, finally see the light.
(I know realistically this will mostly be used on family members, but the thought of someone trying to do this to a co-worker they barely know over Teams chat is comical)
r/GenderCynical • u/pearkeet • 5d ago
it’s wild to me that they think we(the adult trans children) don’t know they do this
r/GenderCynical • u/pearkeet • 8d ago
Jennifer Sey struggles to understand that there’s a difference in reactions at a BB game, between her “sex reality” shirts and the shirts the stadium provides themselves
r/GenderCynical • u/pearkeet • 10d ago
TERF tries to pretend that high quality CPR training doesn’t apply to everyone with breasts
r/GenderCynical • u/dennythehorse • 11d ago
"If as a woman you have a choice and you still bring more males in this world I have a huge issue with that."
r/GenderCynical • u/throwaway933878494 • 11d ago
rape of trans women is apparently okay because they must all secretly want it
r/GenderCynical • u/SurrealistGal • 13d ago
Radfem tries to 'Moral-post' by proclaiming Trans People are human, then immediately gets taken over by another Radfem who goes nuclear in the other direction.
r/GenderCynical • u/pearkeet • 14d ago
never lose hope- because even our enemies don’t believe they can win
r/GenderCynical • u/Abagaail • 14d ago
Just casually admitting that even if they couldnt deny the science was 100 on trans peoples side they still want us dead NBD
r/GenderCynical • u/Icantsleepnoow • 14d ago
Shameless TERF account deletes tribute to cis-woman because she didn’t look “woman” enough!
r/GenderCynical • u/pearkeet • 15d ago
never let your trans child have any sort of positive familial relationship, ever
r/GenderCynical • u/CLOWTWO • 17d ago
Old interaction I came across earlier. Insanity.
This person is literally just a crossdresser and thats still too much for the TERFs lmfao. Is women wearing pants manface then? Like I physically cannot comprehend this idiotic logic. Comparing it to blackface is genuine insanity
r/GenderCynical • u/OrneryPerformance604 • 17d ago
TERFs minimizing the crimes of the Nazis is unsurprising
r/GenderCynical • u/Kallixeina • 19d ago
If your teenage son plays D&D, he's probably already on cross-sex hormones, mocking real women. Also, Israel.
Some gems from the comment section under a Substack post by “Parents with Inconvenient Truths about Trans (PITT)”. The author listed eight early warning signs that your child might be in need to be “save[d] from trans”, including starting hormone therapy and changes in voice.
The comments then mention other telltale signs, like D&D and mermaids. And it's the comments where the real action begins, where the strange transphobic alliance of gender-critical “feminists”, conservatives, and right-wing extremists comes into action.
*Red*, who identifies as “gender realist” (she got something wrong here) and pretends to be a mother, not only warns parents of D&D, but also cares a lot about people's right to participate in sports. No, not trans people's right, of course. Israeli athletes' right. Israeli-athletes-who-want-to-make-a-political-statement-in-support-of-their-country's right.
*Red* also notes that trans women tend to be leftists on economic issues, but she doesn't seem to have a clear idea of what communism entails. According to Karl Marx, whom some consider an accepted authority on the subject, communism is a model of social organization in which everyone works “nach seinen Fähigkeiten” (“according to his ability”) and receives goods and services “nach seinen Bedürfnissen” (“according to his needs”). Now that I think about it, I should have chosen another color for *Red*. Well, to be entirely fair to her, a communist society could also decide to require its members to work, even if it's “only” according to their ability.
*Blue* appears to describe themselves as a white person. They have decided that transsexualism disproves the immutable nature of sexual orientation, leaving the reader to wonder how they came to their conclusion, or how you could even string these thoughts together. Even though *Blue* calls themselves an “intellectual liberal”, they are now rejecting the Democratic Party and calling heterosexuality the only healthy form of sexuality. Their homophobic turnaround might have been fueled by a religious awakening, as their last paragraph suggests.