Diane and Arlen Chase have spent a good portion of their lives uncovering the once-great city of Caracol. Their groundbreaking research is rewriting everything we thought we knew about the Maya
Archaeologists once considered Caracol a minor site barely worth their time, but its remoteness turned out to be an asset. Other Maya strongholds like Tikal in Guatemala and Chichén Itzá in Mexico were first encountered by European colonists in the 19th century.
Caracol, hidden in dense tropical forest, had barely been excavated when the Chases arrived in the 1980s. Over the following decades their painstaking work exploded a number of misleading myths about the Maya. For centuries, most scholarly assumptions about this ancient civilization came from the writings of Friar Diego de Landa, a 16th-century Spaniard who lived as a missionary among the Maya communities in the Yucatán.
By his own account, de Landa burned most of the Maya’s hieroglyphic codices. “ These people also used certain characters or letters, with which they wrote in their books about the antiquities and their sciences ” de Landa wrote in Yucatán Before and After the Conquest.
“ We found a great number of books in these letters, and since they contained nothing but superstitions and falsehoods of the devil, we burned them all, which they took most grievously, and which gave them great pain .” As American scholar William Gates wrote, introducing his English translation of de Landa’s writings, the bishop “ burned 99 times as much knowledge of Maya history and sciences as he has given us .”
De Landa falsely portrayed the Maya as largely an impoverished rural peasantry lorded over by a ruthless aristocracy who dwelled in monumental cities. “ The Spanish imposed their worldview on everything over here " Arlen said.
“ And if you look back at Spain in the 1500s, what are you dealing with? You had knights and nobles in castles, and everyone else was scattered throughout the countryside. The Spaniards slapped that two-class model onto the Maya. ”
By the time Arlen and Diane were in graduate school at the University of Pennsylvania in the 1970s, more was known about the ancient culture—for instance, that the Maya had designed one of the world’s most sophisticated calendars and held a deep understanding of astronomy, mathematics and architecture.
But most scholars saw the Maya as peaceful stargazers so absorbed by gauzy ceremonial pursuits that they neglected certain practical concerns. In the influential 1954 book The Rise and Fall of Maya Civilization, British archaeologist J. Eric S. Thompson wondered how the Maya were able to “ chart the heavens yet fail to grasp the principle of the wheel; to visualize eternity as no other semi-civilized people has ever done, yet ignore the short step from corbeled to true arch; to count in millions yet never learn to weigh a sack of corn. ”
Anthropologists believed that Maya cities had been near-empty husks, with a dispersed, rural population who ventured into town only for occasional ceremonies, or to serve elites. Arlen and Diane challenged this conventional wisdom. In 1979, four years after they were married, they set off for a six-year stint at Santa Rita Corozal, a Maya site in Belize just south of the Mexican border.
As they excavated residential areas, they found that many non-elites had owned tools made of obsidian, a dark, glassy stone found only in distant volcanic regions. Scholars at the time assumed that Maya elites had total control over ancient economies and distributed goods directly to specific people. But the sheer number of non-elites in Santa Rita who had this imported material made it unlikely that elites were bestowing obsidian directly to those households as gifts or rewards.
A more plausible explanation was that Santa Rita was an important trading junction, between the coastline and two rivers, and that residents had market access to imported goods like obsidian, jade, ceramics and shells.