Boring Asian Female and A Good Person are two examples of Unhinged Woman novels that are currently very popular and being marketed as fun: "hilariously unhinged," "laugh-out-loud," impossible to put down (the second a book is marketed this way I already know I'm probably being told to enjoy a woman's mental health meltdown as a form of entertainment).
And while I consider myself fully weirdgirl, this genre has started to bother me. It's hard to critique, though, because anything negative about the plot or the protagonist gets waved off as "well she's a bad person, that's the point.
I hate that both women depend entirely on outside approval. Elizabeth's whole concern is "did Harvard say yes." When Harvard says no, she doesn't have a single moment of "why did I hand my whole identity to an admissions committee," she just skips straight to stalking a woman named Laura Kim. The book opens with real, racialized admissions anxiety, and the idea that success only has one shape (career, money, marriage, 2.5 kids), and then never looks back.
Lillian in A Good Person has 100%, bought into the idea that she'll only be happy if she hooks an average guy named Henry. She's marketed and reviewed as transgressive, but she's not raging against anything. She builds her life around being chosen by a man and gets mad when he doesn't choose her back.
My point is that a woman behaving badly is not automatically subversive just because the main character is a woman. "Character does something transgressive" is not the same as "book examines the system that made her this way." I feel like these books are getting credit for depth, humor, weirdness they do not earn.
Anyway, I fully expect to get downvoted for this, but meh. I just want to complain about a woman stalking someone's Chipotle order for 300 pages and being told this is depth.