29 of the 68 posts (43%) are at least loosely about free speech.

- Left: 18 of 46 (39%)

- Right: 5 of 14 (36%)

- Neutral: 6 of 8 (75%)

Counting elections, protests, riots and terrorism as well, which is typically accepted as free speech adjacent on this sub, 48 of the 68 posts (71%) relate to free speech. Here's the share of each side's posts:

- Left: 32 of 46 (70%)

- Right: 10 of 14 (71%)

- Neutral: 6 of 8 (75%)

I have to apologize to Rogue_Journalist for putting you as right. Your recent posts actually would have had you in neutral but I knew that wouldn't go over well with the regulars in this community so I put my thumb on the scale for that one.

All for insulting prophet MAPhammad.

Beatrice Keul, a Swiss former pageant contestant, told committee staff that Trump “violently raped” her in a suite at New York’s Plaza Hotel during his November 1993 American Dream pageant. She says that earlier that day, Epstein approached her and introduced himself as “Don’s best friend.”

Keul says Trump grabbed her from behind, tore her dress and left her bleeding and bruised. Afterward, she says, he repeated his offer to arrange a visa and admission to NYU and made her promise to keep quiet, saying, “The show must go on.”

Fucking lol. It's been a banner few days for trump, what with the kiddie rape, the failures, and now this.

‘The Last Ditch,’ a bar that catered to lesbians in the hyper-woke enclave of western Massachusetts has announced it’s closure. Just one month prior, they attempted to roll back their N95 mask requirements for one night per week in an attempt to make there place more appealing to patrons who were not completely captured by the virtue of covid fear. This decision was met by protests of the loud minority, which included violent threats including hopes the establishment would be “firebombed.”

This is a good reminder of the fate of those who bow to the tyranny of Mnatelly Ill Rtaerds.

A wise man once said “everything woke goes to shit.” And this lesbian bar appears to be no exception.

From the article:

A federal judge demanded to know the precedent for sequestering ballots as he heard arguments from the Department of Justice and California officials on the Trump administration’s emergency bid to force the state to set aside and not tabulate ballots from 20,000 people.
“Give me the case, give me the state,” U.S. District Judge David Carter asked as his first question in a hearing in Los Angeles Tuesday afternoon. The government, represented by Bill Essayli, the top federal prosecutor in L.A., didn’t respond.
Carter, a Bill Clinton appointee, overall seemed disinclined to grant the Trump administration’s request for a temporary restraining order to immediately stop California from processing and counting ballots from 20,000 people it alleges are “likely” noncitizens until citizenship status is confirmed.
“You’ve got a remedy for goodness sake. Go out and indict,” Carter told the DOJ, referring to a federal criminal statute that makes it a misdemeanor for noncitizens to vote in federal elections.
“I’d like you to respond why, in balancing those two interests, this court would cause disenfranchisement where voters would not be counted versus the ability to catch those few who are [noncitizen voters], as you’ve ably done,” he added.