Before we get into discussions, I would just like to ask one thing... could we all respect one another in this post? If we disagree that's fine, I simply request we do not resort to name calling.
So what are we all thinking of Hollywood Arts? Don't be shy, give your real thoughts.
Personally I gave it a 5, I could be talked into a 5.5, but it didn't live up to its predecessor in my book. When Victorious came out, I was about six years old, and watched it alot, along with ICarly. Partially, because my older sister would never fork over the damn remote, and partially because I grew to enjoy it. But I won't judge it soley by it's first season, when it is still testing the waters.
Having watched the first season, it's not horrible, but it lacks a distinctive voice. Since it's a spinoff, of course it's going to have Victorious's DNA in it. But that overeliance is weakening it, It's too focused on nostalgia and copying it. I mean, I mean look at Qwest, Jen, and Pepper. He's basically a ripoff of Andre, and Pepper is pretty much Cat, and Jen is basically a watered-downed Jade. Emmy, I will admit, I think I might find her more interesting than Tori, not a diss on Tori who I like, but there's more depth to Emmy. Unlike Tori, she had to exist in the shadow of her talented older siblings, and she's coming to terms with the fact she is just as talented then him, if not more so in certain areas.
Oscar's cool, I like that premise because Oscar isn't simply a confident, popular performer. He has to confront what happens when the identity he's built around being exceptional is challenged by someone close to him.
Season One question: Is there something here worth developing? And the first season proved, with difficulty, that there is.
Oscar's cool, I like that premise because Oscar isn't simply a confident, popular performer. He has to confront what happens when the identity he's built around being exceptional is challenged by someone close to him.
Now the first season did, with difficulty, accomplish what the first season of a show is created to accomplish... prove the show is worthy of existing. But everything boils down to if the second can do its job and make the show work.
Assuming the second does what all second seasons of a show should do: recalibrate its characters and start solidifying it's own identity. The characters are watchable, there are decent stories, and there are things worth building on. Season Two question: What makes this show uniquely itself?
Let's use the Big Bang Theory as an example, in the first season, Sheldon acted out of character then in later seasons, such as eating Chinese Food that he put in the trash when he and Leonard had to lie to Penny. Season 9 Sheldon would have bit off his own tongues rather then done that. Penny was a bit more airheaded and sweet, before becoming more grounded, cutting, and street-smart in the later seasons.
If the second season is successful, the creative identity established in Season 2 now drives the storytelling. Character dynamics feel natural and established, original storylines flourish, and the show consistently delivers on its own particular strengths.
The writers aren't still figuring out what the show is supposed to be. They're demonstrating what it can do.
Season Three question: Can this show consistently deliver on its own potential?
Emmy's technology skills and the school's social-media platform, The Dap, could give the show a distinctive perspective on online performance, creative ownership, and the pressure to turn everything into content. The series has already established the platform; the opportunity is to make it matter thematically. Maybe add in another main character. One dedicated to screenwriting and directing, it would be nice to see a main character more intrigued by the prospect of working behind the camera, and working to ensure the production proceeds smoothly.
That last point is especially important. The show doesn't need to abandon its Victorious heritage. It needs to use that heritage as a foundation for stories that couldn't have been told in quite the same way in the original series.
One personal complaint is that just like Victorious, it sets up a romantic payoff only to hold back on delivering it! You already hurt people by not getting Beck and Tori together, stop hurting us in this way! You can't do the platinum music awards, tease us with a kiss twice, not have them get together, and then air the opposite date, thereby bringing up the topic again.
I mean if they didn't get together that's fine, but if you set it up over and over again and then you don't deliver... that's just mean. It's childish, but it's true. Robbie and Trina, it was looking like it was gonna happen only to have the rug swept out from under us at the last moment, because suddenly he's moving to New Zealand.
I think That ’90s Show is a good example of why I’m not judging Hollywood Arts entirely by its first season. When I watched That ’90s Show, I didn’t think the first season was perfect, and I wouldn’t put it on the same level as That ’70s Show, but I still enjoyed it. It was watchable, there was potential, and I could see what the show was trying to accomplish. Then Season 2 came along, and I felt like the series did a much better job establishing its own identity. The characters started feeling more like people I wanted to follow in their own right, rather than just a new generation occupying a familiar setting. It still benefited from the connection to the original, but that connection wasn't the only reason to watch.
That’s what I’m hoping Hollywood Arts can accomplish. I grew up watching Victorious, so of course the nostalgia is part of what got me interested. But nostalgia can only carry a show so far. Eventually, I need Emmy, Oscar, Qwest, Pepper, Jen, and the rest of the cast to give me reasons to care about their stories, their personalities, and their relationships—not just remind me of characters I already loved. I want the new characters to develop distinct identities, with their own strengths, flaws, conflicts, and ambitions, instead of feeling like variations of the original cast. And I don't think that's an unreasonable expectation, especially when a first season is still figuring itself out.
That’s why I’m willing to give Hollywood Arts time. I’m not asking it to be Victorious all over again, or even to surpass it. I’m asking it to learn from what made Victorious work while discovering what makes this new generation worth following. That ’90s Show showed me that a continuation doesn't have to get everything right immediately; it can build on its foundation and become more confident in what it wants to be. I’m hoping Hollywood Arts can do the same: let Season 1 establish the potential, let Season 2 sharpen its identity, and, hopefully, let Season 3 demonstrate what the show can really do. Because nostalgia might get people through the door, but the characters and stories are what will make us want to stay.
I'm hoping to see some organic cameos from legacy characters, and maybe a mention that Tori and Beck got together.
That concludes this post, please give your honest thoughts, but once again, I simply ask for respect to be given between everybody.