Thought I’d take my shot at an unpopular opinion here! But there it is. 🫠 I feel one should be able to pull out a Nintendo Switch at work and play a game for a little while. We’ve normalized cell phones to such a degree that no one questions if someone is at their desk on their cell phone — watching YouTube, on social media, dead scrolling during work hours. I’ve worked multiple office jobs and you see it all the time. Apparently that’s totally fine. But God forbid I switched it to a handheld gaming device. I’d be instantly judged or told it’s not acceptable. 💀 What’s the difference? Obviously, cell phones or hand held devices shouldn’t be utilized while one is working. But my point is this: if you’re going to socially normalize one and give an unspoken green light to it during work hours, but not the other — it’s a bit hypocritical. It’s all or nothing lol.

In light of the recent discontinued production of pennies, I think it’s time we also evaluate the $1 bill as well. While the penny was discontinued for many economic reasons, my opinion stems more from the change in societal needs for currency. $1 in the US doesn’t have nearly as much buying power as it used to. As the cost of goods rise, less and less items are costing around $1, and less under that. To me that signifies that the dollar bill is being relegated to a change currency, with the $5 bill being the next bill up that can comfortably buy many different kinds of small items. Yes, the $2 bill exists, but it is not used widely enough and would be dwarfed quickly with the continued rise of costs.

Since it is illegal for people under the age of 18 or 21 (depending on state and local laws) to gamble in the US, any TV show, movie, or sporting event that features or advertises sports gambling or 'prediction markets' should be rated as 18+ content.

I love the Last of Us but the biggest problem I have with the sequel is them trying to get us to empathize with the people who tortured Joel.

I've seen people say that we should've started out as Abby after having killed Joel, played as her, watched her friends die and then it's revealed that she killed Joel and we switch to Ellie.

I feel like that would've made more sense and helped people not be as biased and also made for a good twist.

These are symbolic presentations for the people in the building. They have never been associated with the start of individual television programs. Broadcasting them is gratuitous and a waste of broadcast time.

Edit- Yes I am talking about pro US sports leagues, not international competition

Lola is absolutely shallow, opportunistic and status obsessed. I’m not arguing that she was secretly a good person. But she WAS remarkably transparent about what she wanted.

Oscar becomes rich and famous, and Lola suddenly wants him because she likes status, money, attention and being associated with someone important. That is terrible relationship material, but it is not exactly a hidden agenda. She straight up called him a loser when they first met and ADMITTED what she wanted. She didn’t come around and pretend she secretly loved him the whole time. She never lied about any of that.

Meanwhile, the entire movie is built around Oscar lying about being the “Sharkslayer.”

Angie is obviously a much better person and even friend than Lola, and she definitely cared about Oscar before he became famous. But I’ve started to dislike the idea that this automatically meant Oscar was supposed to end up with her.

Angie having loved him before the fame does not mean she needed to end up with Oscar. She also doesn’t fully confess how she feels until Oscar is already involved with Lola, and the argument becomes partly, “I loved you before all of this.”

Okay. That proves Angie cared about the real Oscar.
It still does not mean Oscar owed her attraction.
People are usually much better at recognizing this when the genders are reversed. If a man quietly loves his woman best friend for years, supports her through everything, and then gets upset when she dates someone else, most people correctly say:
“You were her friend. She doesn’t owe you romance because you were nice to her.”

Same principle here.

By all means, tell Oscar that Lola is a terrible choice because she only wants him when he has status.
But the solution did not have to be, “Therefore Angie is your rightful girlfriend.”

Oscar could have ended the movie single.
He could have learned that chasing status was making him miserable, become comfortable with himself, and eventually met someone who liked him for who he actually was, AND whom he was genuinely attracted to.

And Angie could have found somebody who reciprocated her feelings without needing an entire movie to notice her. Lola being a user does not make Angie entitled to being Oscar’s romantic interest.

Angie being loyal does not make Lola healthy.
And Oscar being an idiot does not mean the movie needed to reward one woman with him like he was the final prize at a carnival.

Sometimes the emotionally healthier ending is simply: none of these people should date each other right now.

The explicit content industry is incredibly awful for the "actors", to put it so vaguely and mildly. If generated content impacts the financial viability of real content enough, who knows how many victims or potentially future victims could be spared because of it.

This is just for a standard family day, not restaurants or big occasions. But, just washing dishes by hand as you go through the day and after dinner is way easier than loading a dishwasher, running the cycle and then unloading the machine. Just washing dishes them as they are used put them in the drying rack.

Just for reference- I have a wife and kid and cook three meals a day, just like doing them by hand🤷🏻‍♂️

Why do people hate glitter? Just the concept of it, i understand some is bad for the environment . But i just mean like when glitter gets on things like now you have a bedazzled pretty sparkly thing. Now that thing is prettier than what it was before . Glitter is awesome.

I love playing football, in real life or on a video game... but honestly, watching it has become a torture, especially club football.

Before the season even starts, any fan with half a working brain already knows who's going to win the title and who's going to finish near the top.

Famous last words: MESMA MERDA

The cause is money and the damn inequality.

- Bayern won eleven Bundesliga titles in a row

- PSG strolls through France and even put the reserve team plenty of times

- Barcelona and Real crush their league without letting anyone breathe

- In Brazil, Flamengo and Palmeiras play with gigantic budgets and are already turning our league into a cesspool

- Leicester, Leverkusen, Monaco, Lille, Valencia, Deportivo, Atlético... All exceptions.

Inflation completes this nightmare. Nowadays, any scrub is worth millions of euros.

Absolute Shit!

Football needs to discuss spending caps and new rules... otherwise it'll always be... this.

I have always avoided taking an IQ test even though I grew up in gifted and advanced placement programs. I think that if you find out that you have a high score, you can become arrogant and stop listening to advice from others, thinking you are always the smartest in the room. On the other hand, if you find out you have a low IQ score, you can lose your confidence and feel hopeless. I don’t see any benefit to knowing your IQ score.

I feel like it's almost unfair to be able to add this to a chore* list

If you 'wash the dishes' (ie let the dishwasher wash the dishes for you), this should be included in the end task

It takes less than an extra minute

I dont think we are conciously aware of the fact that the literal most important person in our entire life is ourselves. Everyone knows it, but so few are concious about it.

A friend doesnt want to hang out as often, a lover decides that they dont love you anymore, a random person makes a hurtful comment, your bestfriend betrays you. These are all bad experiences created by other people. The sole reason they are this bad is because we give value to them.

But YOU deserve atleast 1000x more value, because it is your own life. It should be disrespectful to your own being that you get sad because of other people. I’m not saying to ignore your emotions or something, but the initial impact is much lesser compared to your own thinking about these events.

If you love yourself, respect yourself and value yourself more, then you’ll realize no one even comes close to hurt you that much in the beginning. You are the only one to experience your life, all others are just random people, you are there all the way from the beginning to the end. Love you all.

Edit: I dont mean this as being selfish, as you could understand from the examples I just gave you. Its more about the bad experiences that YOU had. I'm all for helping others and being a community, and I always give too much of myself to other people. The main thing I'm saying that these people shouldnt be able to take part in your mental health, because you (and your mental health) are much much more important! We are social creatures and bond too deeply with our close ones, but we shouldnt forget that this is OUR life and experience, very independently.

It tastes so bad, it doesn’t even taste like chocolate. I love anything and everything chocolate and hersheys syrup is that 1 thing I wouldn’t even take for free.

I think it's so much easier to tell someone you love them, because, if you like em, what's the guarantee it'll ever turn into love, you can like someone, so many people but it's so rare to love someone as deeply as your existence.

People right now are complaining that Deadlock has been getting worse because they are assigned to toxic or incompetent people in the team, like it's a unique situation and worse than Marvel Rivals for example. Isn't that the case for every game like this? I think no matter what you play and the game has comms you'll always meet someone toxic, same thing with incompetent players who SOMEHOW climbed up to high rank/level

Team-based games harbor the worst people naturally, so best one can do is just playing not to win and muting anyone who screams on mic. It's that easy.

Specific unpopular opinion, but we should bring back smart casual wear similar to what people used to wear in the 50’s and before. Obviously modernised I’m not talking Victorian style attire. IMO when you wear smart clothes or a suit for instance there’s an instant confidence and importance you get that you don’t have with any other clothing, and when you look at old timey footage of people going about their day theirs such an elegance to it and I’m sure they felt it in themselves and at the sight of other people wearing smart clothes.

Throwing this out there but the government should run a program where for atleast a year or half a year they make it mandatory for all clothing boutiques to sell smart casual clothing and only that clothing, just to see how the public reacts to it. Maybe small at first in like a town or something, just to see how people react.

Also there would be good incentive for this aswell, you think about how much waste the clothing industry makes. Atleast for a while make it mandatory they can only sell high quality clothes.

Sleeping with extra clothes on feels better than sleeping in just underwear, and I don't care what the temperature is. Whether it's freezing cold or hot enough to make you sweat, there's something comforting about having that extra layer of fabric against your skin. A T-shirt, sweatpants, maybe even socks. It just feels right. People act like sleeping with less clothing is automatically more comfortable, but I genuinely don't get it. Sometimes I want to feel wrapped up in my own clothes under a blanket, like I'm cocooned from the world. Being half-naked in bed just doesn't hit the same.

If you’re already fit is fine might help a bit of definition I guess but won’t make you change your body and if you’re not already lean is absolutely useless.
Yoga at least makes you flexible but again, if you’re looking into losing weight and get fit, you either already are or these stuff won’t help. Just do your cardio and your weights and watch calories and macros. That’s it

Letterboxd used to be a platform for film fans to actually share their opinions and provide nuanced reviews of films. Over the last few years, it’s become so mainstream and popularized that too many casuals have come onto the app and ruined its intention. Now, every review is some shitty, unfunny one-liner purely intended to farm likes. I was looking through the Clayface review page today to see what people were thinking of the movie, and every top review was just some unfunny joke from people with TikTok humor. If you look at more esoteric films or even ones from a few years ago when the app was smaller, those films actually had substantive reviews from actual film fans.

Look, I’m fine with having joke reviews, it’s a social media platform after all. But the app has turned into a bunch of wannabe comedians competing to see who can get the most likes rather than a place for actual analysis. I know they never would as it would dramatically reduce their engagement, but I honestly wish Letterboxd could either add a dislike button or disable likes entirely to stop this.

Also, the influx of casuals has also led to a disproportionate amount of recency bias. Films like Obsession, The Odyssey, and Project Hail Mary have inflated scores and are immediately thrown into the highest rated films of all time. This is mostly because of people who just throw 5-star movies at the latest popular thing or any new movie that they like. The app used to have balanced ratings and a top rated movies list filled with more unknown, older, or foreign films that are less popular, as opposed to something like the IMDB top 250. That was one of the reasons I used to enjoy the app so much, and now that’s gone. I honestly think we need a new app like this for real film fans and need to ensure we keep it niche. I have nothing against people who casually enjoy movies or are just looking for a fun time, but they don’t belong on an app intended for cinephiles, and the influx of them has ruined Letterboxd’s intended purpose.

A genuinely good person doesn't do things for others just to have it returned. They help because they want to, not because they're secretly keeping score and expecting people to pay them back with the same kindness. The moment you start resenting someone for not treating you the way you treat them, it makes you wonder whether your kindness was ever truly selfless in the first place

and don't get me wrong, it's perfectly fine to want mutual effort and to walk away from one-sided relationships. But there's a difference between recognizing that someone is taking advantage of you and getting angry because you expected them to operate exactly like you do. You can expect respect without expecting repayment for every good thing you do.

If your kindness disappears the moment it isn't reciprocated, maybe you're not being kind just for the sake of being kind. Maybe you're doing it because you want something in return. And that's not selflessness; that's a transaction disguised as a good deed

I have to wonder if these people have ever attended a wedding when they were a child. If they did, then having such a requirement is entitled and rude. Adults have caused way more drama at weddings than children have. It is weird antisocial behavior and the reasons I have heard for it boil down to being too selfish or entitlement. Weddings are about sharing an important life event with your loved ones and closest friends. Their children are part of that circle whether you prefer it or not.

I do not have children so I have no dog in this fight.

With the UK version on Series 22, and the international series still going, the law of diminishing returns has been in effect for many years now. The worst comedy is unfunny comedy, and if there is still a space for the market for 'nice' comedy, what is stopping Alex Horne doing another format. Maybe he'll be funny again. Rigidly sticking to Taskmaster when you know its gone sour prevents you doing another show that could still include new and diverse talent, although SNL UK has that remit now as well. Please stop. Please.

Woah mama, Last of Us 2, no one ever talks about that! I get it, this topic is old and has probably been tired out. But I wanna share my opinion because I don’t think many people are on the middle ground position I’m arguing for. SPOILERS below.

Most people think this game is either one of the greatest masterpieces conceived by man or the worst abomination in existence and may as well have crawled out of Hell itself.

But what if I told you that this game is neither good nor bad when you weigh the evidence?

The game’s voice acting, gameplay, and graphics are great, and so much so that this is relatively non-controversial. Even the story could be considered good for a video game if you pretend like this game is an original story and not a sequel. Video game stories are not supposed to be that great in my opinion. Many “movie games” wouldn’t really pass very well as actual movies or tv series.

The problem with this game is that it’s a horrible sequel, it takes the original game’s characters and disrespects them so much that it reeks of the nihilism this game doesn’t want to admit. You don’t just take a beloved character who was the main one in the original story and make a sequel where he’s tortured and killed 2 hours in. Ultimately this game’s story and dialogue seem to be a mouthpiece for the writer’s philosophical or retrospective views on the original game.

The apologetics for this game can get really annoying and dishonest as well. Some of it feels so rationally forced because people want to like it. TLOU2 fails the sequel test and the cinema test. But it does not fail the video game test or the independent (video game) story test. The game is aight.