r/SubredditDrama • • Apr 21 '16

Rare User in /r/Physics takes issue with Dark Matter, others React.

/r/Physics/comments/48ogjf/whats_wrong_with_the_big_bang_theory/d0lnav8?context=3
118 Upvotes

77 comments sorted by

62

u/PhysicsIsMyMistress Apr 21 '16 edited Apr 21 '16

I hate that some people ascribe a certain undue significance to the term dark matter while completely missing the real significance. It's not called dark matter because its mysterious or hidden or because it's "made up." It's dark because to doesn't interact with the electromagnetic force. People need to understand that the way we interact with things are through gauge bosons and when you see something is because it interacts with photons. Dark matter doesn't, therefore you can't see it.

63

u/blasto_blastocyst Apr 21 '16

How can people just live their lives without realizing that?

21

u/Kyldus Apr 22 '16

They deserve our scorn and pity.

11

u/McGlockenshire Apr 22 '16

It's easy if your only exposure to high level science stuff is through popular media and that satisfies you enough to not investigate deeper.

Dark matter doesn't impact the lives of the general public, so most are going to be satisfied just knowing that it exists and some scientists are kinda upset/wtf'd by it.

14

u/abuttfarting Apr 21 '16

Dark matter does, therefore you can't see it.

Doesn't*

Good post otherwise though. I'm an astrophysics grad student and dark matter is the 2nd most common subject I'm asked about, after black holes. I basically say the same thing, but without mentioning gauge bosons.

3

u/YesThisIsDrake Apr 21 '16

This is a sci*fi question, but its there any plausible material that could interact with dark matter of dark energy outside of gravity?

I'm writing a book and I just went with uranium plasma because its dense but I'm no physicist.

→ More replies (13)

1

u/PhysicsIsMyMistress Apr 21 '16

Bah, that's what I get for typing on my phone! :p

4

u/[deleted] Apr 22 '16

I don't know man. I watched the first season on Netflix and it was enjoyable. It does ape firefly pretty hard but at least this show got a second season.

3

u/takaci Apr 21 '16

It's dark because to doesn't interact with the electromagnetic force

Does dark matter interact strongly or weakly? It should interact weakly because it has mass right?

8

u/PM_ME_YOUR_PAULDRONS Apr 21 '16

It pretty definitely interacts gravitationally (gravitational effects are how we know its there at all).

If it interacted strongly we probably would have detected it in experiments by now. It is expected (in most models) to interact weakly but we havent detected it yet. We have results saying stuff like "if it interacts weakly then it does so with probability less than p otherwise we would have seen in" where p is a very small number which depends on the experiment in question.

If it doesn't interact weakly (which would be a bit insane but is predicted by sterile neutrino models and others) them we're a bit screwed as far as detecting it goes...

→ More replies (2)

37

u/cdstephens Apr 21 '16

Ultimately this is an issue of people assuming scientists use the rudimentary scientific model taught in high school (as he brings up at some point). This is not really what physicists do....we don't throw out a whole theory because we get unexpected results, and we don't make hypothesises in a vacuum. Frequently, new physics is anticipated not just by some new observation that doesn't jive with current theories or models, but also contradictions or signs within the theory itself. Examples include the ultraviolet catastrophe, incongruence between Maxwell's equations and Newtonian mechanics regarding how EM is manifestly relativistic, and in modern times the issue of quantum mechanics and gravity. These self consistency issues that can lead to new groundbreaking experiments. Instead of throwing out old theories you adapt them, because these old theories are robust and work in some limit. Like, regardless of how quantum mechanics works, it needs to produce Newton's laws at the end of the day. When physicists test things, they make well tested and supported assumptions of the behavior of the system because if they didn't, physics would progress painfully slowly. This also means that experiments that defy well tested assumptions (see the neutrino faster than light experiment) are very suspect and have to be thoroughly tested.

14

u/oleub Apr 21 '16

the ultraviolet catastrophe

good name for a band

5

u/8132134558914 Apr 22 '16

Someone should get on that before it gets taken

9

u/tick_tock_clock Apr 22 '16

we don't make hypothesises in a vacuum

Relevant xkcd

(possibly also this one)

23

u/kookingpot Apr 21 '16

Did anyone else think they were referring to the SyFy show Dark Matter at first?

I was probably 15 comments in before it dawned on me that they were talking about actual dark matter as in the astronomical phenomenon and not Dark Matter the TV show.

10

u/justcool393 Apr 21 '16

When I first read the title, the capitalized React immediately made me think of The Fine Bros.

4

u/[deleted] Apr 22 '16

When I saw the title of the video in the linked thread, I thought it was going to be about the show, The Big Bang Theory.

3

u/whatplanetisthis Apr 21 '16

The way the title of this post was capitalized is weird. I was also thinking of the show.

1

u/fuckmyasspissboy Apr 22 '16

I was thinking the poet duo and their recent unsettling post, but then again most drama of that kind sticks to tumblr.

32

u/Twatson8 Apr 21 '16

Fine Bros sue

6

u/[deleted] Apr 22 '16

This guy being angry about dark matter isn't really rare. He is quite possibly Reddit's angriest cosmologist and has been featured on SRD before.

3

u/superiority Apr 22 '16

The guy doesn't seem to understand the difference between "this theory cannot predict this particular measurement" and "this theory cannot make testable predictions".

Like... the existence of dark matter is inferred from the motion of galaxies (in short: "These galaxies aren't moving the way we'd expect them to based on our knowledge of gravity and our observations of where stars are. One explanation is that there's more stuff floating around the universe that gives off gravity, but we just can't see it."). So yeah, that does mean that you can't then truly predict the motion of galaxies using a model of dark matter., because those models are constructed to fit these existing observations. Like the guy says, this would indeed be circular logic.

But that doesn't mean your model of dark matter can't predict something else.

2

u/dabaumtravis Apr 21 '16

Thought this was going to be about the show Dark Matter :(

1

u/SnapshillBot Apr 21 '16

http://imgur.com/a/JLRVN

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - 1, 2, 3

I am a bot. (Info / ^Contact)

-27

u/Psychofant Apr 21 '16

I should stay out of r/Physics. That guy hits all my pet peeves and is getting aggressively downvoted for it. You can't see Dark Matter. You can't explain it. But if you assume that it exists, you can explain things you couldn't otherwise explain.

That brings it frighteningly close to being religion.

→ More replies (39)