4
u/msobelle Mar 22 '15
My favorite:
fotoforensics only checks if the noise patterns are different. Seeing as he brought in one part of the image to another part of the image fotoforensics wouldn't pick it up. Laws of optics define this is fake, and he's been a dick in the other comments if you look through the thread
4
2
0
Mar 22 '15
6
u/msobelle Mar 22 '15
I don't care either way. I don't have the right camera to try and duplicate it. I just found drama in that subreddit to be surprising. 85+ comments is highly unusual.
5
u/Aegeus Mar 22 '15
The curved mirror makes objects appear a few meters closer. Not a few hundred meters.
2
Mar 22 '15 edited Mar 22 '15
The image of his car is crisp as the springtime rain though.
Yes the side mirror would change things a little, but not THAT much. It does not finangle something 100-200 odd meters away into the same depth of field as something four feet away.
One of the easiest ways to spot doctored focus is when there's more than one depth of field. Between the clear reflection of the car, the out of focus exterior, and the clear reflection of the reflection of the windmill, this picture has two distinct depths of field that are very large distances apart. IE - It's faked, or, breaking the laws of physics.
7
u/[deleted] Mar 22 '15
13hrs and counting. Will OP deliver?