r/SubredditDrama • • Mar 14 '15

Someone gets very angry about the dictionary definition of philosophy. Short drama, but does not lack in viciousness with a quadruple-post to show that "I literally have the dictionary definition of philosophy you intellectual ball of shit"

/r/philosophy/comments/2ydd98/read_if_youre_bored/cp8gaxh
43 Upvotes

39 comments sorted by

8

u/[deleted] Mar 14 '15

I don't know if this qualifies as "short" drama, given OP's inclination towards staggeringly long ramblings...

6

u/mnamilt Mar 14 '15

All of these comments were added after I posted the link. Even better drama, so Im not complaining. :)

→ More replies (1)

13

u/Zombies_hate_ninjas Mar 14 '15

Every single thing that op posts could easily be posted to r/imverysmart.

He's probably my favorite try hard yet.

7

u/ComedicSans Mar 14 '15

This is an amazing catch. Well done, u/mnamilt.

4

u/burnwhencaught Mar 14 '15

If only they hadn't deleted their account...

I feel as though the laughs would go on forever...

11

u/ComedicSans Mar 14 '15

[–][deleted] -3 points 17 hours ago*
Well chemical constituents are particulate combinatorics with quark measure distributions associated by gluons, and we know particles, or simple (non-complex) structures have intrinsic properties, not that they obey governance but they have charcteristics (quantifiable). In combination, and specifically so, the combinatoric facilitates an interaction that associates with a dynamic system, particles become entangled and by proximity share commonality even nonlocally. Thought is a dynamic resultant of physical interaction, electrical energy in directed sequence, and intangible in quantification but qualifiable as actual or hypothetical reflection of real occurrence (some event of some system in a continuum of spatiality with the tetra dimensional conditionality of temporality; or the constant enumeration of action. Thusly thought is a complex chemical reaction, an invisible one like a gaseous emission, rudimentarily speaking and taking liberties with the notion of Structure (including fields or spatially occupying objects) if we generalize interaction, we facillitate the variation of phase states and possibilities of physical substance, however minute, and realize that things radiate and emanate and emit and luminesce and fuse, forces gravitate and compel attractions on a microscopic level. With PET SCANS we know blood flow and cerebral regionality, with calculus we could successively approximate a number of neurons and evaluate the permeability and the deviation (reduction) of light speed for impulses as an average giving neuronal connectivity to certain brain regions. Extrapolating and using a time series analysis, we can measure thought as some "forceful" action occurring subsequent to protein reception, a stage in a series of particles bumping into masses of particles in varying structures of varying complexity.
The complexity is essential because there is a hierarchical scale, where n=a rank that 'radiates' the sensorial or memorial energetic redirection, like a conversion from the AtP and glucose to specific brain regions that handle different situations. Thusly it becomes cerebro-geographic as to where this invisible energetic expenditure of thought (sensorial analytics) is distributed which is difficult given the hyper numerical instance of such capable faculties, though clearly sonic interpretation is sensorial, it's the disruption of air particles at an intensity much like photonics are an energetic intensity registering as light or temperature from the sun, so a thought and interpretive mentality is an analaytic capability of a logarithmically impressive amalgamation of fundamentality in serendipitous combination, where an atom = rank n and a brain = rank n + some billions. It's as if the particles of the universe are like drops of water forming puddles, and some puddles are deep, like stars, which can essentially create life and planets and orbits, and smaller shallower 'puddles' are the brains of the simple creatures. It's all about how many combine in this giant rainstorm of the existent condition, and gravity is the condensation where universal expansion is the precipitation, everything else is drops, puddles, streams, rivers . Black holes are the whirlpools in the oceans, to be excruciatingly metaphorical but water is a wondrous analog for physics phenomenon. Thusly sentience is jus a puddle that happens to be ever so deep, and cannot compete to the fusion of the torrid ocean that is a star. Stars are not self aware, though sentience is awareness. It's not Intrinsically intelligence so much as it is a co tiniation of particle attraction. We eat things; our particles are basically seeking out more particles. We breathe air, particles and need sunlight (particles) we are engines of energetic continuance, a complex dynamic where particles seek to attract to other particles. Everything else is just lurid imperfection :)
Sorry, I'm no fan of brevity

Holy fucking copypasta.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/xEidolon Mar 14 '15

I honestly find difficulty not using high register language.

Evidently he also finds difficulty when speaking in a high register.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/ComedicSans Mar 14 '15

[–] Shitgenstein 6 points 7 hours ago

Philosophy is the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge

That's epistemology.

and with sentient chemical interaction sequences

Losing me...

of energetic impulse of fundamental physicality

Go fuck yourself.

You sound like a grade A pretentious douche.

Hahahaha, I love it.

7

u/ComedicSans Mar 14 '15

[–][deleted] 1 point an hour ago
The most impressive terms are eigenvectors Lorentz transforms and path integrals you fucking piece if shit. Just because the words I use Impress you doesn't mean they impress me. Everyone will sound like a fucking drone if people think like small minded pieces of shit like you. And you know what bith, I'll say again this is my second spoken language and I'm making perfect sense. Go post on a philosophy or physics forum in an Asian language you fucking sack of shit

Everything sounds better if you add multiple syllable words. Testicles.

[–][deleted] 1 point an hour ago
Don't cheers me I fucking despise you

Hahahaha. Holy shit this guy is angry.

4

u/Eternally65 Mar 14 '15

At best you'll get me banned for calling you a piece of shut, and to me, you are lecherous and pretentious.

Lecherous? Really?

https://youtu.be/G2y8Sx4B2Sk

→ More replies (7)